The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solid-Phase Synthesis of Difficult Peptide Sequences at Elevated Temperatures: A Critical Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Heating Technologies
Abstract
The Fmoc/t-Bu solid-phase synthesis of three difficult peptide sequences (a 9-mer, 15-mer, and 24-mer) was performed using N,N'-diisopropylcarbodiimide/1-hydroxybenzotriazole as coupling reagent on polystyrene, Tentagel, and ChemMatrix resins. In order to obtain an insight into the specific role of the elevated temperature and/or the electromagnetic field for peptide syntheses carried out using microwave irradiation, peptide couplings and Fmoc-deprotection steps were studied under microwave and conventionally heated conditions at the same temperature. While room temperature couplings/deprotections generally produced the difficult peptides in rather poor quality, excellent peptide purities were obtained using microwave heating at a temperature of 86 degrees C for both the coupling and deprotection steps in only 10 and 2.5 min reaction time, respectively. While for most amino acids no significant racemization was observed, the high coupling temperatures led to considerable levels of racemization for the sensitive amino acids His and Cys. It was demonstrated for all three peptide sequences that when performing the coupling/deprotection steps at the same reaction temperature using conventional heating, nearly identical results in terms of both peptide purity and racemization levels were obtained. It therefore appears that the main effect of microwave irradiation applied to solid-phase peptide synthesis is a purely thermal effect not related to the electromagnetic field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kamiński, Z. J., Kolesińska, B., Kolesińska, J., Sabatino, G., Chelli, M., Rovero, P., Błaszczyk, M., Główka, M. L., & Papini, A. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja054260y · Cited by 155
Cited by
Peptide Coupling Reagents, More than a Letter Soup
El-Faham, A., & Albericio, F. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr100048w · Cited by 1,245
Advances in Fmoc solid‐phase peptide synthesis
Behrendt, R., White, P., & Offer, J. (2016) · Journal of Peptide Science · doi:10.1002/psc.2836 · Cited by 760
Microwave Effects in Organic Synthesis: Myth or Reality?
Kappe, C. O., Pieber, B., & Dallinger, D. (2013) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201204103 · Cited by 554
Self-citationDeng, C., Wu, J., Cheng, R., Meng, F., Klok, H.-A., & Zhong, Z. (2014) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.10.008 · Cited by 371
The greening of peptide synthesis
Lawrenson, S. B., Arav, R., & North, M. (2017) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c7gc00247e · Cited by 205
Metadata
- Authors
- Bacsa, B., Horváti, K., Bõsze, S., Andreae, F., & Kappe, C. O.
- Venue
- The Journal of Organic Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-08-27
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 7532-7542
- ISSN
- 0022-3263 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6904
- OpenAlex
- W2078071703
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.