Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Synthesis and Biophysical Evaluation of 2′,4′-Constrained 2′O-Methoxyethyl and 2′,4′-Constrained 2′O-Ethyl Nucleic Acid Analogues

Seth, Punit P., Vasquez, Guillermo, Allerson, Charles A., Berdeja, Andres, Gaus, Hans, Kinberger, Garth A., Prakash, Thazha P., Migawa, Michael T., Bhat, Balkrishen, Swayze, Eric E.·2010·The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Abstract

We have recently shown that combining the structural elements of 2'O-methoxyethyl (MOE) and locked nucleic acid (LNA) nucleosides yielded a series of nucleoside modifications (cMOE, 2',4'-constrained MOE; cEt, 2',4'-constrained ethyl) that display improved potency over MOE and an improved therapeutic index relative to that of LNA antisense oligonucleotides. In this report we present details regarding the synthesis of the cMOE and cEt nucleoside phosphoramidites and the biophysical evaluation of oligonucleotides containing these nucleoside modifications. The synthesis of the cMOE and cEt nucleoside phosphoramidites was efficiently accomplished starting from inexpensive commercially available diacetone allofuranose. The synthesis features the use of a seldom used 2-naphthylmethyl protecting group that provides crystalline intermediates during the synthesis and can be cleanly deprotected under mild conditions. The synthesis was greatly facilitated by the crystallinity of a key mono-TBDPS-protected diol intermediate. In the case of the cEt nucleosides, the introduction of the methyl group in either configuration was accomplished in a stereoselective manner. Ring closure of the 2'-hydroxyl group onto a secondary mesylate leaving group with clean inversion of stereochemistry was achieved under surprisingly mild conditions. For the S-cEt modification, the synthesis of all four (thymine, 5-methylcytosine, adenine, and guanine) nucleobase-modified phosphoramidites was accomplished on a multigram scale. Biophysical evaluation of the cMOE- and cEt-containing oligonucleotides revealed that they possess hybridization and mismatch discrimination attributes similar to those of LNA but greatly improved resistance to exonuclease digestion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jo902560f

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Seth, P. P., Vasquez, G., Allerson, C. A., Berdeja, A., Gaus, H., Kinberger, G. A., Prakash, T. P., Migawa, M. T., Bhat, B., & Swayze, E. E.
Venue
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
Published
2010-02-08
Volume
75
Issue
5
Pages
1569-1581
ISSN
  • 0022-3263 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6904
OpenAlex
W1985013843
Cited by
211
References
0
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synthesis and Biophysical Evaluation of 2′,4′-Constrained 2′O-Methoxyethyl and 2′,4′-Constrained 2′O-Ethyl Nucleic Acid Analogues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jo902560f
The paper
Seth, P. P., Vasquez, G., Allerson, C. A., Berdeja, A., Gaus, H., Kinberger, G. A., Prakash, T. P., Migawa, M. T., Bhat, B., & Swayze, E. E. (2010). Synthesis and Biophysical Evaluation of 2′,4′-Constrained 2′O-Methoxyethyl and 2′,4′-Constrained 2′O-Ethyl Nucleic Acid Analogues. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo902560f

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.