Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,509

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adiabatic Connection for Kinetics

Lynch, Benjamin J., Fast, Patton L., Harris, Maegan, Truhlar, Donald G.·2000·The Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Abstract

A new hybrid Hartree−Fock−density functional (HF-DF) model called the modified Perdew−Wang 1-parameter model for kinetics (MPW1K) is optimized against a database of 20 forward barrier heights, 20 reverse barrier heights, and 20 energies of reaction. The results are compared to other hybrid HF-DF methods with the 6-31+G(d,p) basis. The new method reduces the mean unsigned error in reaction barrier heights by a factor of 2.4 over MPW1PW91 and by a factor of 3 over B3LYP.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp000497z

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,509

Metadata

Authors
Lynch, B. J., Fast, P. L., Harris, M., & Truhlar, D. G.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Published
2000-05-09
Volume
104
Issue
21
Pages
4811-4815
ISSN
  • 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5215
OpenAlex
W1981451973
Cited by
1,509
References
3
FWCI
30.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.