The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using Kohn−Sham Orbitals in Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theory to Investigate Intermolecular Interactions
Abstract
This is the first reported use of a hybrid method involving density functional theory (DFT) and symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT) to calculate intermolecular interactions. This work was stimulated by the reported failures of supermolecular DFT calculations to adequately predict intermolecular (and interatomic) interactions, particularly of the van der Waals type. The goals are to develop a hybrid scheme that will calculate intermolecular interaction energies accurately and in a computationally efficient fashion, while including the benefits of the energy decomposition provided by SAPT. The computational savings result from replacing the costly perturbation theory treatment with DFT, which should include the intramolecular correlation effects on the intermolecular interaction energies. The accuracy of this new hybrid approach (labeled SAPT(DFT)) is evaluated by comparisons with higher level calculations. The test cases include He 2, Ar 2, Ar−H 2, (H 2 O) 2, (HF) 2, CO 2 −CH 3 CN, and CO 2 -dimethylnitramine. The new approach shows mixed results concerning the accuracy of interaction energies. SAPT(DFT) correctly predicts all the qualitative trends in binding energies for all test cases. This is particularly encouraging in dimer systems dominated by dispersive interactions where supermolecular DFT fails to predict binding. In addition, the method achieves a drastic reduction (a factor of at least 100) in computational time over the higher level calculations often used to predict these forces. With respect to quantitative accuracy, this initial hybrid scheme, using the very popular exchange-correlation functional B3LYP, overestimates the second-order energy components (e.g., induction and dispersion terms) for all of the test cases, and subsequently overestimates the total interaction energy for all dimer systems except those heavily dominated by the electrotstatic interactions. The SAPT energy decomposition points to the use of DFT virtual orbital eigenvalues in the second-order perturbation terms as the likely cause for this error. These results are consistent with earlier work suggesting that DFT canonical virtual orbital energies obtained from commonly used functionals are less than optimal for use in such a perturbative scheme. The first-order interaction energy terms from the SAPT(DFT) are found to be generally more accurate than the second-order terms, and agree well with the benchmark values for dimers containing molecules with a permanent electric dipole moment. These first-order terms depend only upon the occupied MO eigenvectors, and hence are not affected by the inaccuracies in the Kohn−Sham DFT virtual orbital eigenvalues. These observations encourage future studies utilizing newly reported functionals, some of which have been developed to directly address problems with DFT virtual orbital energies and the asymptotic region of the electron density.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
Cited by
S66: A Well-balanced Database of Benchmark Interaction Energies Relevant to Biomolecular Structures
Řezáč, J., Riley, K. E., & Hobza, P. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct2002946 · Cited by 1,019
Riley, K. E., Pitoňák, M., Jurečka, P., & Hobza, P. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1000173 · Cited by 759
Long range interactions in nanoscale science
French, R. H., Parsegian, V. A., Podgornik, R., Rajter, R. F., Jagota, A., Luo, J., Asthagiri, D., Chaudhury, M. K., Chiang, Y.-M., Granick, S., et al. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.1887 · Cited by 441
Towards the simulation of large scale protein–ligand interactions on NISQ-era quantum computers
Malone, F. D., Parrish, R. M., Welden, A. R., Fox, T., Degroote, M., Kyoseva, E., Moll, N., Santagati, R., & Streif, M. (2022) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d1sc05691c · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, H. L., & Chabalowski, C. F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-12-29
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 646-659
- ISSN
- 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5215
- OpenAlex
- W2046530772
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.