Cited by 48Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Towards the simulation of large scale protein–ligand interactions on NISQ-era quantum computers

Open access
Malone, Fionn D., Parrish, Robert M., Welden, Alicia R., Fox, Thomas, Degroote, Matthias, Kyoseva, Elica, Moll, Nikolaj, Santagati, Raffaele +1 more·2022·Chemical Science

Abstract

accuracy in the SAPT interaction energies. In SAPT(VQE), the quantum requirements, such as qubit count and circuit depth, are lowered by performing computations on the separate molecular systems. Furthermore, active spaces allow for large systems containing thousands of orbitals to be reduced to a small enough orbital set to perform the quantum portions of the computations. We benchmark SAPT(VQE) (with the VQE component simulated by ideal statevector simulators) against a handful of small multi-reference dimer systems and the iron center containing human cancer-relevant protein lysine-specific demethylase 5 (KDM5A).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d1sc05691c

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Outeiral C., Strahm M., Shi J., Morris G. M., Benjamin S. C. and Deane C. M., 2021, The prospects of quantum computing in computational molecular biology, arXiv:2005.12792 · arXiv
  2. Huggins W. J., O'Gorman B. A., Rubin N. C., Reichman D. R., Babbush R. and Lee J., 2021, arXiv:2106.16235 · arXiv
  3. Hapka M., Przybytek M., and Pernal K., 2021, arXiv:2104.06891v1 · arXiv
  4. Anselmetti G.-L. R., Wierichs D., Gogolin C. and Parrish R. M., 2021, arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.05695 · arXiv
  5. O'Gorman B., Huggins W. J., Rieffel E. G. and Whaley K. B., 2019, arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.05118 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malone, F. D., Parrish, R. M., Welden, A. R., Fox, T., Degroote, M., Kyoseva, E., Moll, N., Santagati, R., & Streif, M.
Affiliations
  • QC Ware Corporation, Palo Alto, CA, 94301, USA
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Parrish, Robert M.
  • Moll, Nikolaj
Venue
Chemical Science
Published
2022
Volume
13
Issue
11
Pages
3094-3108
ISSN
  • 2041-6520 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-6539
OpenAlex
W3203001455
Cited by
48
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemical Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Boehringer Ingelheim
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
quantum chemistry, protein-ligand interactions, variational quantum eigensolver, KDM5A, iron centers, quantum simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review