The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Energetics and Dynamics of Enzymatic Reactions
Abstract
This review considers the advances made in using computer simulations to elucidate the catalytic power of enzymes. It is shown that some current approaches, and in particular the empirical valence bond approach, allow us to describe enzymatic reactions by rigorous concepts of current chemical physics and to estimate any proposed catalytic contribution. This includes evaluation of activation free energies, nonequilibrium solvation, quantum mechanical tunneling, entropic effects, and other factors. The ability to evaluate activation free energies for reactions in water and proteins allows us to simulate the rate acceleration in enzymatic reactions. It is found that the most important contribution to catalysis comes from the reduction of the activation free energy by electrostatic effects. These effects are found to be associated with the preorganized polar environment of the enzyme active site. The use of computer simulations as effective tools for examining different catalytic proposals is illustrated by two examples. First, we consider the popular proposal that enzymes catalyze reactions by special dynamical effects. It is shown that this proposal is not supported by any consistent simulation study. It is also shown that the interpretation of recent experiments as evidence for dynamical contributions to catalysis is unjustified. Obviously, all chemical reactions involve motion, but unless this motion provides non-Boltzmann probability for reaching the transition state there are not dynamical effects. Vibrationally enhanced tunneling is shown to be a well understood phenomenon that does not lead to special catalytic effects. Similarly, it is shown that nonequilibrium solvation effects do not constitute dynamical contributions to catalysis. Second, the effectiveness of simulation approaches is also demonstrated in studies of entropic contributions to catalysis. It is found that the corresponding contributions are smaller than previously thought.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Current Status of Transition-State Theory
Truhlar, D. G., Garrett, B. C., & Klippenstein, S. J. (1996) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jp953748q · Cited by 2,279
Cited by
Q UANTUM M ECHANICAL M ETHODS FOR E NZYME K INETICS
Gao, J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2002) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.53.091301.150114 · Cited by 733
Friesner, R. A., & Guallar, V. (2005) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.55.091602.094410 · Cited by 522
Computer Simulations of Enzyme Catalysis: Methods, Progress, and Insights
Warshel, A. (2003) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.32.110601.141807 · Cited by 503
Self-citationQM/MM Methods for Biological Systems
Senn, H. M., & Thiel, W. (2006) · Topics in Current Chemistry · doi:10.1007/128_2006_084 · Cited by 428
Mechanisms and Free Energies of Enzymatic Reactions
Gao, J., Ma, S., Major, D. T., Nam, K., Pu, J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050293k · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Villà, J., & Warshel, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-07-24
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 7887-7907
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2068502964
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.