The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determination of the Platinum and Ruthenium Surface Areas in Platinum−Ruthenium Alloy Electrocatalysts by Underpotential Deposition of Copper. I. Unsupported Catalysts
Abstract
Underpotential deposition (upd) of copper has been used to characterize platinum, ruthenium, and platinum−ruthenium high-surface-area unsupported (powder black) electrocatalysts. The surface areas thus obtained compare favorably with those determined by the more conventional electrochemical methods of monolayer CO and hydrogen oxidation. The differing adsorption energies for Cu on either Pt or Ru allow the peaks for upd copper deposited on alloy Pt−Ru to be resolved into their constituent components. Thus, in addition to the surface area, the surface composition of the Pt−Ru electrocatalyst can be determined. This approach distinguishes between bare ruthenium (i.e., metallic) and oxidized ruthenium sites as the upd copper does not deposit on the latter. The ruthenium surface area is found to remain high up to 0.45 V (vs RHE) and then to fall linearly with potential. Polarization at high potentials [1.45 V (vs RHE)] leaves a material in which metallic ruthenium cannot be recovered by electrochemical reduction. This is caused by oxidation of the ruthenium to a state that either dissolves in the aqueous phase and is lost or produces a form of oxidized ruthenium that is in a state that cannot be electrochemically reduced.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methanol oxidation and direct methanol fuel cells: a selective review
Wasmus, S., & Küver, A. (1999) · Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0022-0728(98)00197-1 · Cited by 1,308
Hydrogen adsorption and oxide formation on platinum single crystal electrodes
Yamamoto, K., Kolb, D. M., Kötz, R., & Lehmpfuhl, G. (1979) · Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0022-0728(79)80380-0 · Cited by 191
Cited by
Design of electrocatalysts for oxygen- and hydrogen-involving energy conversion reactions
Jiao, Y., Zheng, Y., Jaroniec, M., & Qiao, S. Z. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00470a · Cited by 5,388
Enhanced catalytic activity in strained chemically exfoliated WS2 nanosheets for hydrogen evolution
Voiry, D., Yamaguchi, H., Li, J., Silva, R., Alves, D. C. B., Fujita, T., Chen, M., Asefa, T., Shenoy, V. B., Eda, G., et al. (2013) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3700 · Cited by 2,641
Chatenet, M., Pollet, B. G., Dekel, D. R., Dionigi, F., Deseure, J., Millet, P., Braatz, R. D., Bazant, M. Z., Eikerling, M., Staffell, I., et al. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs01079k · Cited by 2,025
An efficient and pH-universal ruthenium-based catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction
Mahmood, J., Li, F., Jung, S.-M., Okyay, M. S., Ahmad, I., Kim, S.-J., Park, N., Jeong, H. Y., & Baek, J.-B. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2016.304 · Cited by 1,685
High Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Activity of an Anomalous Ruthenium Catalyst
Zheng, Y., Jiao, Y., Zhu, Y., Li, L. H., Han, Y., Chen, Y., Jaroniec, M., & Qiao, S.-Z. (2016) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b11291 · Cited by 1,110
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, C. L., & Kucernak, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-01-09
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1036-1047
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2032867218
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.