Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 423

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Determination of the Platinum and Ruthenium Surface Areas in Platinum−Ruthenium Alloy Electrocatalysts by Underpotential Deposition of Copper. I. Unsupported Catalysts

Green, Clare L., Kucernak, Anthony·2002·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

Underpotential deposition (upd) of copper has been used to characterize platinum, ruthenium, and platinum−ruthenium high-surface-area unsupported (powder black) electrocatalysts. The surface areas thus obtained compare favorably with those determined by the more conventional electrochemical methods of monolayer CO and hydrogen oxidation. The differing adsorption energies for Cu on either Pt or Ru allow the peaks for upd copper deposited on alloy Pt−Ru to be resolved into their constituent components. Thus, in addition to the surface area, the surface composition of the Pt−Ru electrocatalyst can be determined. This approach distinguishes between bare ruthenium (i.e., metallic) and oxidized ruthenium sites as the upd copper does not deposit on the latter. The ruthenium surface area is found to remain high up to 0.45 V (vs RHE) and then to fall linearly with potential. Polarization at high potentials [1.45 V (vs RHE)] leaves a material in which metallic ruthenium cannot be recovered by electrochemical reduction. This is caused by oxidation of the ruthenium to a state that either dissolves in the aqueous phase and is lost or produces a form of oxidized ruthenium that is in a state that cannot be electrochemically reduced.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp0131931

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Green, C. L., & Kucernak, A.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2002-01-09
Volume
106
Issue
5
Pages
1036-1047
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W2032867218
Cited by
423
References
2
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.