The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nucleation of Polypropylene Crystallization by Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes
Abstract
Nonisothermal and isothermal crystallization experiments were performed on polypropylene mixed with carbon nanotubes produced by disproportionation of CO on Co−Mo catalysts. Functionalization of the nanotubes with octadecylamine made the tubes hydrophobic and allowed the tubes to be solubilized in an organic solvent. Mixing of the nanotubes with the polymer was accomplished by adding the nanotubes to a Decalin solution that contained dissolved polypropylene, followed by evaporation of the solvent. Dynamic mechanical analysis indicated very little difference in the small-strain mechanical properties between filled and unfilled polymers at the very low solid levels that were tested. By contrast, the crystallization behavior of the filled and unfilled polymer was quite different. Nanotubes promoted growth of the less-preferred beta form of crystalline polypropylene at the expense of the alpha form. In nonisothermal crystallization, the total amount of crystalline material in the sample was the same for the filled and unfilled materials. However, for isothermal crystallization experiments, the percent crystallinity in the filled materials was slightly higher. Most importantly, the rate of crystallization was substantially higher in the filled system. The results presented in this paper clearly show that carbon nanotubes nucleate crystallinity in polypropylene.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carbon nanotube–polymer composites: Chemistry, processing, mechanical and electrical properties
Spitalsky, Z., Tasis, D., Papagelis, K., & Galiotis, C. (2010) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.09.003 · Cited by 3,125
Big returns from small fibers: A review of polymer/carbon nanotube composites
Breuer, O., & Sundararaj, U. (2004) · Polymer Composites · doi:10.1002/pc.20058 · Cited by 1,246
Koerner, H., Price, G., Pearce, N. A., Alexander, M., & Vaia, R. A. (2004) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1059 · Cited by 1,034
Multifunctional Shape‐Memory Polymers
Behl, M., Razzaq, M. Y., & Lendlein, A. (2010) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200904447 · Cited by 971
Polymer Crystallization-Driven, Periodic Patterning on Carbon Nanotubes
Li, L., Li, C. Y., & Ni, C. (2006) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja056923h · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Grady, B. P., Pompeo, F., Shambaugh, R. L., & Resasco, D. E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-05-21
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 5852-5858
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2069205186
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.