The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhancing Proton Mobility in Polymer Electrolyte Membranes: Lessons from Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Abstract
Typical proton-conducting polymer electrolyte membranes (PEM) for fuel cell applications consist of a perfluorinated polymeric backbone and side chains with SO 3 H groups. The latter dissociate upon sufficient water uptake into SO 3 - groups on the chains and protons in the aqueous subphase, which percolates through the membrane. We report here systematic molecular dynamics simulations of proton transport through the aqueous subphase of wet PEMs. The simulations utilize a recently developed simplified version (Walbran, A.; Kornyshev, A. A. J. Chem. Phys . 2001, 114, 10039) of an empirical valence bond (EVB) model, which is designed to describe the structural diffusion during proton transfer in a multiproton environment. The polymer subphase is described as an excluded volume for water, in which pores of a fixed slab-shaped geometry are considered. We study the effects on proton mobility of the charge delocalization inside the SO 3 - groups, of the headgroup density (PEM “equivalent weight”), and of the motion of headgroups and side chains. We analyze the correlation between the proton mobility and the degree of proton confinement in proton-carrying clusters near SO 3 - parent groups. We have found and rationalized the following factors that facilitate the proton transfer: (i) charge delocalization within the SO 3 - groups, (ii) fluctuational motions of the headgroups and side chains, and (iii) water content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electroosmotic drag in polymer electrolyte membranes: an electrophoretic NMR study
Ise, M., Kreuer, K. D., & Maier, J. (1999) · Solid State Ionics · doi:10.1016/s0167-2738(99)00178-2 · Cited by 235
Cited by
Kreuer, K.-D., Paddison, S. J., Spohr, E., & Schuster, M. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020715f · Cited by 2,187
Self-citationWater transport in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells
Jiao, K., & Li, X. (2011) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2010.06.002 · Cited by 1,086
Proton Transfer 200 Years after von Grotthuss: Insights from Ab Initio Simulations
Marx, D. (2006) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.200600128 · Cited by 920
Modeling Transport in Polymer-Electrolyte Fuel Cells
Weber, A. Z., & Newman, J. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020729l · Cited by 738
Transport in Polymer-Electrolyte Membranes
Weber, A. Z., & Newman, J. (2004) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1639157 · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Authors
- Spohr, E., Commer, P., & Kornyshev, A. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-09-24
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 10560-10569
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2009592144
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.