Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Robust and Affordable Multicoefficient Methods for Thermochemistry and Thermochemical Kinetics: The MCCM/3 Suite and SAC/3

Lynch, Benjamin J., Truhlar, Donald G.·2003·The Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Abstract

Scaling all correlation (SAC) and multicoefficient correlation methods (MCCMs) have been shown to provide excellent ratios of accuracy to cost for the calculation of atomization energies. Inspired by this success, we have now fine-tuned the choices of correlation-energy levels and basis sets to determine the four most promising MCCMs and the most promising SAC method, and we optimized them against a larger and more diverse database than has previously been used for MCCM methods; the new database, called Database/3, consists of atomization energies, ionization potentials, electron affinities, and reaction barrier heights. The end results of this process are labeled as MCCM-version 3 (or MCCM/3) and SAC/3; the members of MCCM/3 are labeled MC-CO/3, MC-UT/3, MC-QCISD/3, and MCG3/3. The new methods are compared to other single-level ab initio methods, to hybrid density functional theory, and to the G3, G3S, and CBS-Q schemes. For neutral molecules, the mean unsigned error in atomization energies per bond using the SAC/3, MC-CO/3, MC-UT/3, MC-QCISD/3, and MCG3/3 methods are 1.4, 0.7, 0.5, 0.4, and 0.2 kcal/mol respectively, and these errors as well as the mean unsigned errors in ionization energies, electron affinities, and barrier heights compare very well with those in previous methods with higher costs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp0221993

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lynch, B. J., & Truhlar, D. G.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Published
2003-04-19
Volume
107
Issue
19
Pages
3898-3906
ISSN
  • 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5215
OpenAlex
W2023466796
Cited by
274
References
0
FWCI
11.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.