Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conformational Dynamics of Trialanine in Water. 2. Comparison of AMBER, CHARMM, GROMOS, and OPLS Force Fields to NMR and Infrared Experiments

Mu, Kosov, Daniil S., Stock, Gerhard·2003·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

Driven by recent two-dimensional infrared experiments by Woutersen and Hamm, trialanine has emerged as a paradigm to study conformational dynamics of a small peptide in aqueous solution. Employing the exceptional amount of experimental and ab initio data, in this work, trialanine serves as a model problem to perform a comprehensive comparison of six popular force fields, including the recent versions of the AMBER, CHARMM, GROMOS, and OPLS models. For all force fields under consideration, 20 ns long molecular-dynamics simulations are performed, and the structure and conformational dynamics of the solvated peptide is studied in detail. Employing density-functional theory calculations at the B3LYP/6-31+G(d) level, a number of observable quantities are calculated directly from the molecular-dynamics data and compared to experiment. The comparison allows for a quite detailed interpretation of recent NMR and infrared experiments. The nowadays achievable reliability and accuracy of a molecular dynamics description of a highly flexible biomolecular system are discussed in some detail.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp022445a

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Mu, Kosov, D. S., & Stock, G.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2003-05-01
Volume
107
Issue
21
Pages
5064-5073
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W2064987795
Cited by
200
References
1
FWCI
4.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.