The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Force Field Influence on the Observation of π-Helical Protein Structures in Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Abstract
In this study, we have investigated the sampling of π-helical conformations, with i, i + 5 hydrogen bonding, using empirical force fields. From replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations of the helical peptide acetyl-(AAQAA) 3 -amide using the CHARMM22 force field and implicit solvent, we find rapid conversion from an initial α-helix to π-helical conformations. While this confirms similar studies of different peptides in explicit solvent, it does not agree with experimental data where π-helices are rarely observed. The sampling of π-helices is significantly diminished in favor of canonical α-helices when a newly extended CHARMM22/CMAP force field is used, where the backbone dihedral φ/ψ potential map in a vacuum is matched exactly to high-level quantum mechanical data for an alanine dipeptide model system. Energetic analysis shows that the difference between α- and π-helical conformations of the alanine dipeptide in a vacuum is 2.6 kcal/mol according to quantum mechanical calculations while both conformations are energetically equivalent in the unmodified CHARMM22 potential. Similar trends are also found in a number of other empirical force fields, suggesting that the observation of π-helical conformations in molecular dynamics simulations is mostly a force field artifact.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mackerell, A. D., Feig, M., & Brooks, C. L. (2004) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20065 · Cited by 3,319
Self-citationRecent developments and applications of the CHARMM force fields
Zhu, X., Lopes, P. E. M., & MacKerell, A. D. (2012) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.74 · Cited by 263
Abrams, J. B., & Tuckerman, M. E. (2008) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp805039u · Cited by 221
A gate in the selectivity filter of potassium channels
Bernèche, S., & Roux, B. (2005) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2004.12.019 · Cited by 214
Metadata
- Authors
- Feig, M., MacKerell, & Brooks, C. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-03-01
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2831-2836
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2124709367
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.