Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lipid Bilayers Driven to a Wrong Lane in Molecular Dynamics Simulations by Subtle Changes in Long-Range Electrostatic Interactions

Patra, Michael, Karttunen, Mikko, Hyvönen, Marja T., Falck, Emma, Vattulainen, Ilpo·2004·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

We provide compelling evidence that different treatments of electrostatic interactions in molecular dynamics simulations may dramatically affect dynamic properties of lipid bilayers. To this end, we consider a fully hydrated pure dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine bilayer through 50-ns molecular dynamics simulations and study various dynamic properties of individual lipids in a membrane, including the velocity autocorrelation function, the lateral and rotational diffusion coefficients, and the autocorrelation function for the area per molecule. We compare the results based on the Particle-Mesh Ewald (PME) and reaction field (RF) techniques with those obtained by an approach where the electrostatic interactions are truncated at r cut = 1.8, 2.0, and 2.5 nm. We find that the overall performance of PME is very good; its results are consistent with the expected behavior. The RF method performs rather well, too, despite certain inherent problems and the fact that its results differ from those obtained by PME. Nevertheless, the largest differences are found for the truncation methods, for which all examined truncation methods lead to results distinctly different from those obtained by PME. The lateral diffusion coefficients obtained by PME and truncation at 1.8 nm, for example, differ by a factor of 10, while the PME results are consistent with experimental values. The observed deviations can be interpreted in terms of artificial ordering due to truncation and highlight the important role of electrostatic interactions in the dynamics of systems composed of lipids and other biologically relevant molecules such as proteins and DNA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp031281a

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Patra, M., Karttunen, M., Hyvönen, M. T., Falck, E., & Vattulainen, I.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2004-03-13
Volume
108
Issue
14
Pages
4485-4494
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W2049831150
Cited by
194
References
1
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.