The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Calculation of Diffusion Coefficients in Confined Fluids and Interfaces with an Application to the Liquid−Vapor Interface of Water
Open accessAbstract
We propose a general methodology for calculating the self-diffusion tensor from molecular dynamics (MD) for a liquid with a liquid−gas or liquid−solid interface. The standard method used in bulk fluids, based on computing the mean square displacement as a function of time and extracting the asymptotic linear time dependence from this, is not valid for systems with interfaces or for confined fluids. The method proposed here is based on imposing virtual boundary conditions on the molecular system and computing survival probabilities and specified time correlation functions in different layers of the fluid up to and including the interfacial layer. By running dual simulations, one based on MD and the other based on Langevin dynamics, using the same boundary conditions, one can fit the Langevin survival probability at long time to the MD computed survival probability, thereby determining the diffusion coefficient as a function of distance of the layers from the interface. We compute the elements of the diffusion tensor of water as a function of distance from the liquid vapor interface of water. Far from the interface the diffusion tensor is found to be isotropic, as expected, and the diffusion coefficient has the value D ≈ 0.22 Å 2 /ps, in agreement with what is found in the bulk liquid. In the interfacial region the diffusion tensor is axially anisotropic, with values of D ∥ ≈ 0.8 Å 2 /ps and D ⊥ ≈ 0.5 Å 2 /ps for the components parallel and normal the interface surface, respectively. We also show that diffusion in confined geometries can be calculated by imposing appropriate boundary conditions on the molecular system and computing time correlation functions of the eigenfunctions of the diffusion operator corresponding to the same boundary conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
Cited by
Interfacial Water at Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Surfaces: Slip, Viscosity, and Diffusion
Sendner, C., Horinek, D., Bocquet, L., & Netz, R. R. (2009) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la901314b · Cited by 567
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Water Structure and Diffusion in Silica Nanopores
Bourg, I. C., & Steefel, C. I. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp301299a · Cited by 286
Atomic-Level Viscosity Distribution in the Hydration Layer
Umeda, K., Kobayashi, K., Minato, T., & Yamada, H. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.116001 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, P., Harder, E., & Berne, B. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-03-11
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 6595-6602
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2016969237
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.