The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Platinum Monolayer Electrocatalysts for O2Reduction: Pt Monolayer on Pd(111) and on Carbon-Supported Pd Nanoparticles
Abstract
The kinetics of oxygen reduction was studied in acid solutions on Pt monolayers deposited on a Pd(111) surface and on carbon-supported Pd nanoparticles using the rotating disk-ring electrode technique. These electrocatalysts were prepared by a new method for depositing Pt monolayers involving the galvanic displacement by Pt of an underpotentially deposited Cu monolayer on a Pd substrate and characterized by scanning tunneling and transmission electron microscopies. The kinetics of O 2 reduction shows a significant enhancement at Pt monolayers on Pd(111) and Pd nanoparticle surfaces in comparison with the reaction on Pt(111) and Pt nanoparticles. The four-electron reduction, with a first-charge transfer-rate determining step, is operative on both surfaces. The observed increase in the catalytic activity of Pt monolayer surfaces compared with Pt bulk and nanoparticle electrodes may reflect decreased formation of PtOH. An enhanced atomic scale surface roughness and low coordination of some atoms may contribute to the observed activity. The results illustrate that placing a Pt monolayer on a suitable metal nanoparticle substrate is an attractive way of designing better O 2 reduction electrocatalysts. Also, by using this method the Pt content is reduced to very low levels. The Pt mass-specific activity of the Pt/Pd/C electrode is 5−8 times higher than that of the Pt/C electrocatalyst. The noble metal (Pt + Pd) mass-specific activity is two times higher than that of Pt/C.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mukerjee, S., Srinivasan, S., Soriaga, M. P., & McBreen, J. (1995) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100013a032 · Cited by 439
Cited by
Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells
Debe, M. K. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11115 · Cited by 5,885
Scientific Aspects of Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Durability and Degradation
Borup, R., Meyers, J., Pivovar, B., Kim, Y. S., Mukundan, R., Garland, N., Myers, D., Wilson, M., Garzon, F., Wood, D., et al. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050182l · Cited by 3,402
Kongkanand, A., & Mathias, M. F. (2016) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00216 · Cited by 1,202
Understanding and approaches for the durability issues of Pt-based catalysts for PEM fuel cell
Shao, Y., Yin, G., & Gao, Y. (2007) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.07.004 · Cited by 1,197
Nanostructured Pt-alloy electrocatalysts for PEM fuel cell oxygen reduction reaction
Bing, Y., Liu, H., Zhang, L., Ghosh, D., & Zhang, J. (2010) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b912552c · Cited by 1,154
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, J., Mo, Y., Vukmirovic, M. B., Klie, R., Sasaki, K., & Adzic, R. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-06-22
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 30
- Pages
- 10955-10964
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2063539139
- Cited by
- 675
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Platinum Monolayer Electrocatalysts for O2Reduction: Pt Monolayer on Pd(111) and on Carbon-Supported Pd Nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp0379953
- The paper
- Zhang, J., Mo, Y., Vukmirovic, M. B., Klie, R., Sasaki, K., & Adzic, R. R. (2004). Platinum Monolayer Electrocatalysts for O2Reduction: Pt Monolayer on Pd(111) and on Carbon-Supported Pd Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0379953
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.