Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ethanol Electrooxidation on a Carbon-Supported Pt Catalyst: Reaction Kinetics and Product Yields

Wang, H., Jusys, Z., Behm, R. J.·2004·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

The ethanol oxidation reaction (EOR) on a carbon-supported Pt nanoparticle catalyst was studied by cyclic voltammetry and potential-step measurements as a function of ethanol concentration and reaction temperature (23−60 °C), combining on-line mass spectrometric analysis of the reaction products and electrochemical current measurements. The effect of catalyst loading/electrode roughness was elucidated by comparison with a polycrystalline Pt electrode. Individual, absolute rates for CO 2 and acetaldehyde formation were determined via the doubly ionized carbon dioxide molecular ion at m/z = 22 and the CHO + fragment at m/z = 29, whereas acetic acid yields were calculated as the difference between the Faradaic current (charge) and the sum of the partial currents for oxidation to CO 2 and acetaldehyde, calculated from the calibrated mass spectrometric currents. Incomplete ethanol oxidation to acetaldehyde and acetic acid prevails over complete oxidation to CO 2 under all conditions, the dominant products being acetic acid at low (1 mM) and acetaldehyde at high (0.5 M) ethanol concentration or low catalyst loading/electrode roughness, i.e., on the smooth Pt electrode, whereas current efficiency and product yield for CO 2 formation is on the order of a few percent. The reaction orders for ethanol on Pt/Vulcan are 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9 for CO 2, acetic acid, and acetaldehyde formation and 0.6 for the total Faradaic current, respectively. These trends are discussed in terms of increasing readsorption and subsequent oxidation of volatile, desorbing reaction intermediates with increasing catalyst loading/electrode roughness, considering that acetic acid oxidation is kinetically hindered at room temperature, and a rather low rate for C−C bond breaking under these conditions. The temperature dependence in this temperature range results in an apparent activation energy for the total reaction (Faradaic current) of 32 kJ/mol. The respective values for the partial reactions for CO 2, acetic acid and acetaldehyde formation are 20, 28, and 43 kJ/mol, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp046561k

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 345

Metadata

Authors
Wang, H., Jusys, Z., & Behm, R. J.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2004-11-16
Volume
108
Issue
50
Pages
19413-19424
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W2044908206
Cited by
345
References
1
FWCI
8.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ethanol Electrooxidation on a Carbon-Supported Pt Catalyst: Reaction Kinetics and Product Yields. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp046561k
The paper
Wang, H., Jusys, Z., & Behm, R. J. (2004). Ethanol Electrooxidation on a Carbon-Supported Pt Catalyst: Reaction Kinetics and Product Yields. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp046561k

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.