Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 213

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Transmission Electron Microscopy Study of the Formation of FAU-Type Zeolite at Room Temperature

Valtchev, Valentin P., Bozhilov, Krassimir N.·2004·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

FAU-type zeolite was synthesized at room temperature to study the mechanism of its formation. The sluggish crystal growth kinetics at ambient conditions permitted us to track down the entire sequence of crystallization events from the formation of the initial gel to the complete transformation into a zeolite-type material. The processes taking place at the nanometer scale were studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The crystalline character of the particles observed during the induction period was determined by in situ synchrotron XRD analysis. The study was completed by ex situ X-ray diffraction (XRD), infrared (IR), dynamic light scattering (DLS), N 2 adsorption measurements and chemical analyses. The combined TEM/synchrotron XRD analysis of the initial crystallization stage revealed that zeolite nuclei were formed during the homogenization (1.5 h) of the initial reactants. Nevertheless, a relatively long induction period (10 days) was observed. During this period, extensive exchange between the solid and liquid parts of the system took place. However, the changes in the chemical composition of the gel and mother liquor were not coupled with a detectible increase of the number of nuclei. It seems that the critical factor that triggers the growth process and mass transformation of amorphous into crystalline zeolite material is the attainment of a specific level of chemical evolution of the system, expressed in homogenization of the starting gel approaching stoichiometric FAU compositon. The process of zeolite formation can be divided into four general stages: (i) 0−1.5 h, formation of an amorphous gel with highly variable composition, local formation of stable zeolite nuclei, and nanometer sized metastable hydrated silica phase; (ii) 1.5 h to 10 days, chemical evolution of the gel composition that is coupled with structural rearrangements of the amorphous gel and further development of zeolite nuclei; (iii) 10−14 days, spontaneous mass transformation of the amorphous gel into spherical aggregates of small (10−20 nm) crystals around individual crystallization centers of viable nuclei and collapse of the metastable phases; (iv) 17−38 days, crystal growth involving agglomeration, dissolution, and regrowth of individual nanoparticles around spherical aggregates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp048341c

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Valtchev, V. P., & Bozhilov, K. N.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2004-09-11
Volume
108
Issue
40
Pages
15587-15598
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W1968225768
Cited by
213
References
0
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.