Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 663

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and Assessment of a New Hybrid Density Functional Model for Thermochemical Kinetics

Zhao, Yan, Lynch, Benjamin J., Truhlar, Donald G.·2004·The Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Abstract

A new hybrid Hartree−Fock-density functional model called the Becke88−Becke95 1-parameter model for kinetics (BB1K) was optimized against a database of three forward barrier heights, three reverse barrier heights, and three energies of reaction for the reactions in the BH6 representative barrier height database. We then assessed the newly developed BB1K method against a saddle point geometries database, a database of 42 barrier heights, the AE6 representative atomization energy database, a molecular geometries data set, and a set of 13 zero point energies. The results show that BB1K can give excellent saddle point geometries and barrier heights, and its performance for calculating atomization energies is 40% better than MPW1K. Using a mean mean unsigned error criterion that equally weights the errors in barrier heights and in bond energies, the new BB1K method outperforms all other DFT and hybrid DFT methods by a large margin, and we therefore conclude that it is the best density functional-type method for thermochemical kinetics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp049908s

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, Y., Lynch, B. J., & Truhlar, D. G.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Published
2004-03-12
Volume
108
Issue
14
Pages
2715-2719
ISSN
  • 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5215
OpenAlex
W2141809840
Cited by
663
References
4
FWCI
25.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.