The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computation of the Hardness and the Problem of Negative Electron Affinities in Density Functional Theory
Abstract
The absolute hardness in density functional theory (DFT) is discussed, emphasizing the charge-transfer excitation interpretation. Direct evaluation from the computed ionization potential and electron affinity is intrinsically problematic when the affinity is negative; the calculated affinity exhibits a strong basis set dependence, becoming near zero as diffuse functions are added. An alternative Koopmans-based approximation using local functional eigenvalues uniformly and significantly underestimates the hardness. A simple correction to the Koopmans expression is highlighted on the basis of a consideration of the integer discontinuity. The resulting hardness expression does not require the explicit computation of the affinity and has a straightforward interpretation in terms of the electronegativity. The correction eliminates the underestimation and gives hardness values that do not degrade as the electron affinity becomes more negative. For systems with large negative affinities, the values are an improvement over those from the other approaches. The success can be traced to an implicit, unconventional approximation for the electron affinity, which outperforms the standard approach when the affinity is significantly negative and which does not break down as the basis set becomes more diffuse.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pearson, R. G. (1963) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00905a001 · Cited by 10,475
Cited by
Comparison of DFT Methods for Molecular Orbital Eigenvalue Calculations
Zhang, G., & Musgrave, C. B. (2007) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp061633o · Cited by 911
The interpretation of XPS spectra: Insights into materials properties
Bagus, P. S., Ilton, E. S., & Nelin, C. J. (2013) · Surface Science Reports · doi:10.1016/j.surfrep.2013.03.001 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Tozer, D. J., & De Proft, F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-09-14
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 39
- Pages
- 8923-8929
- ISSN
- 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5215
- OpenAlex
- W2072276121
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.