Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 208

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Computation of the Hardness and the Problem of Negative Electron Affinities in Density Functional Theory

Tozer, David J., De Proft, Frank·2005·The Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Abstract

The absolute hardness in density functional theory (DFT) is discussed, emphasizing the charge-transfer excitation interpretation. Direct evaluation from the computed ionization potential and electron affinity is intrinsically problematic when the affinity is negative; the calculated affinity exhibits a strong basis set dependence, becoming near zero as diffuse functions are added. An alternative Koopmans-based approximation using local functional eigenvalues uniformly and significantly underestimates the hardness. A simple correction to the Koopmans expression is highlighted on the basis of a consideration of the integer discontinuity. The resulting hardness expression does not require the explicit computation of the affinity and has a straightforward interpretation in terms of the electronegativity. The correction eliminates the underestimation and gives hardness values that do not degrade as the electron affinity becomes more negative. For systems with large negative affinities, the values are an improvement over those from the other approaches. The success can be traced to an implicit, unconventional approximation for the electron affinity, which outperforms the standard approach when the affinity is significantly negative and which does not break down as the basis set becomes more diffuse.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp053504y

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 208

Metadata

Authors
Tozer, D. J., & De Proft, F.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Published
2005-09-14
Volume
109
Issue
39
Pages
8923-8929
ISSN
  • 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5215
OpenAlex
W2072276121
Cited by
208
References
1
FWCI
6.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.