The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hybrid Polymer/Zinc Oxide Photovoltaic Devices with Vertically Oriented ZnO Nanorods and an Amphiphilic Molecular Interface Layer
Open accessAbstract
We report on the effect of nanoparticle morphology and interfacial modification on the performance of hybrid polymer/zinc oxide photovoltaic devices. We compare structures consisting of poly-3-hexylthiophene (P3HT) polymer in contact with three different types of ZnO layer: a flat ZnO backing layer alone; vertically aligned ZnO nanorods on a ZnO backing layer; and ZnO nanoparticles on a ZnO backing layer. We use scanning electron microscopy, steady state and transient absorption spectroscopies, and photovoltaic device measurements to study the morphology, charge separation, recombination behavior and device performance of the three types of structures. We find that charge recombination in the structures containing vertically aligned ZnO nanorods is remarkably slow, with a half-life of several milliseconds, over 2 orders of magnitude slower than that for randomly oriented ZnO nanoparticles. A photovoltaic device based on the nanorod structure that has been treated with an amphiphilic dye before deposition of the P3HT polymer yields a power conversion efficiency over four times greater than that for a similar device based on the nanoparticle structure. The best ZnO nanorod:P3HT device yields a short circuit current density of 2 mAcm(-2) under AM1.5 illumination (100 mW cm(-2)) and a peak external quantum efficiency over 14%, resulting in a power conversion efficiency of 0.20%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Photocatalysis on TiO2 Surfaces: Principles, Mechanisms, and Selected Results
Linsebigler, A. L., Lu, G., & Yates, J. T. (1995) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00035a013 · Cited by 11,575
Cited by
One-dimensional ZnO nanostructures: Solution growth and functional properties
Xu, S., & Wang, Z. L. (2011) · Nano Research · doi:10.1007/s12274-011-0160-7 · Cited by 1,361
ZnO nanostructures for optoelectronics: Material properties and device applications
Djurišić, A. B., Ng, A. M. C., & Chen, X. Y. (2010) · Progress in Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1016/j.pquantelec.2010.04.001 · Cited by 1,078
Electrospun nanofibers in energy and environmental applications
Thavasi, V., Singh, G., & Ramakrishna, S. (2008) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/b809074m · Cited by 934
Advanced materials and processes for polymer solar cell devices
Helgesen, M., Søndergaard, R., & Krebs, F. C. (2010) · J. Mater. Chem. · doi:10.1039/b913168j · Cited by 767
Lee, B., Stoumpos, C. C., Zhou, N., Hao, F., Malliakas, C., Yeh, C.-Y., Marks, T. J., Kanatzidis, M. G., & Chang, R. P. H. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja508464w · Cited by 721
Applications of ZnO in organic and hybrid solar cells
Huang, J., Yin, Z., & Zheng, Q. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c1ee01873f · Cited by 578
The effect of three-dimensional morphology on the efficiency of hybrid polymer solar cells
Oosterhout, S. D., Wienk, M. M., van Bavel, S. S., Thiedmann, R., Jan Anton Koster, L., Gilot, J., Loos, J., Schmidt, V., & Janssen, R. A. J. (2009) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2533 · Cited by 531
ZnO−TiO2 Core−Shell Nanorod/P3HT Solar Cells
Greene, L. E., Law, M., Yuhas, B. D., & Yang, P. (2007) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp077593l · Cited by 451
ZnO nanostructured materials for emerging solar cell applications
Wibowo, A., Marsudi, M. A., Amal, M. I., Ananda, M. B., Stephanie, R., Ardy, H., & Diguna, L. J. (2020) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d0ra07689a · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Ravirajan, P., Peiró, A. M., Nazeeruddin, M. K., Graetzel, M., Bradley, D. D. C., Durrant, J. R., & Nelson, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-03-31
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 7635-7639
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W1966654763
- Cited by
- 547
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 43.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.