The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessment of Density Functionals for π Systems: Energy Differences between Cumulenes and Poly-ynes; Proton Affinities, Bond Length Alternation, and Torsional Potentials of Conjugated Polyenes; and Proton Affinities of Conjugated Shiff Bases
Abstract
Woodcock et al. [J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 11923] pointed out that no density functional was able to obtain the correct sign of the relative energies of the allene and propyne isomers of C3H4 and that density functional theory (DFT) predicts that poly-ynes are insufficiently stabilized over cumulenes for higher homologues. In the present work, we show that the recent M05 density functional predicts the correct ordering of allene and propyne and gives a mean unsigned error (MUE) of only 1.8 kcal/mol for the relative energies of the two isomers of C3H4, C5H4, and C7H4. Two other recent functionals, M05-2X and PWB6K, also give reasonably low MUEs, 2.7 and 3.0 kcal/mol, respectively, as compared to 6.2 kcal/mol for the popular B3LYP functional. Another challenging problem for density functionals has been a tendency to overpolarize conjugated pi systems. We test this here by considering proton affinities of conjugated polyenes and conjugated Schiff bases. Again M05-2X performs quite well, with MUEs of 2.1 and 3.9 kcal/ mol, respectively, as compared to 5.8 and 5.9 kcal/mol for B3LYP. Averaged over the three problems, M05-2X has a MUE of 3.0 kcal/mol, the BMK functional of Boese et al. has an MUE of 3.2 kcal/mol, and M05 has an MUE of 5.1 kcal/mol. Twenty-two other tested functionals have MUEs of 5.2-8.1 kcal/mol averaged over the three test problems. Both M05 and M05-2X do quite well, compared to other density functionals, for torsion potentials in butadiene and styrene, and M05 does very well for bond length alternation in conjugated polyenes. Since the M05 functional has broad accuracy for main group and transition metal chemistry and M05-2X has broad accuracy for main group chemistry, we conclude that significant progress is being made in improving the performance of DFT across a wide range of problem types.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zhao, Y., & Truhlar, D. G. (2008) · Theoretical Chemistry Accounts · doi:10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x · Cited by 30,302
Self-citationZhao, Y., & Truhlar, D. G. (2006) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp066479k · Cited by 1,316
Self-citationMardirossian, N., & Head-Gordon, M. (2014) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c3cp54374a · Cited by 986
Peverati, R., & Truhlar, D. G. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2012.0476 · Cited by 734
Self-citationNajibi, A., & Goerigk, L. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00842 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, Y., & Truhlar, D. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-08-12
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 35
- Pages
- 10478-10486
- ISSN
- 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5215
- OpenAlex
- W2116502442
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Density Functionals for π Systems: Energy Differences between Cumulenes and Poly-ynes; Proton Affinities, Bond Length Alternation, and Torsional Potentials of Conjugated Polyenes; and Proton Affinities of Conjugated Shiff Bases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp0630626
- The paper
- Zhao, Y., & Truhlar, D. G. (2006). Assessment of Density Functionals for π Systems: Energy Differences between Cumulenes and Poly-ynes; Proton Affinities, Bond Length Alternation, and Torsional Potentials of Conjugated Polyenes; and Proton Affinities of Conjugated Shiff Bases. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0630626
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.