Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Density Functional Theory Study of Ligand Binding on CdSe (0001), (0001̄), and (112̄0) Single Crystal Relaxed and Reconstructed Surfaces: Implications for Nanocrystalline Growth

Rempel, Jane Y., Trout, Bernhardt L., Bawendi, Moungi G., Jensen, Klavs F.·2006·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

To gain a better understanding of the influence of ligand-surface interactions on nanocrystalline growth, periodic density functional theory calculations were employed in the study of the binding of organic ligands on the relaxed nonpolar (1120) and polar Se terminated (0001) surfaces and the relaxed and vacancy and adatom reconstructed Cd terminated (0001) surface. We examined chemisorption properties of phosphine, amine, phosphine oxide, carboxylic acid, and phosphinic acid model ligands, including preferred binding sites and geometries, vibrational frequencies, and binding energetics, and compared findings to intrinsic growth via addition of CdSe molecules or Cd and Se atoms. Our results indicate that binding of the ligands is preferred in the electron-poor 1-fold sites on all surfaces, with secondary coordination of the acidic ligands through the hydroxyl hydrogen to the electron-rich surface sites. In general ligand adsorption directly obstructs binding sites for growth species on the (1120) surface and only indirectly on the two polar surfaces. The order of binding affinities on the (1120) and (0001) surfaces is PH(3) < OPH(3) approximately HCOOH < NH(3) < OPH(2)OH and that on the (0001) surface is OPH(3) approximately HCOOH < OPH(2)OH < NH(3) < PH(3). Our findings corroborate the experimental observation that incorporation of the nonbulky phosphinic acid-type ligands with high affinity and high selectivity for both the (1120) and (0001) surfaces strongly enhances unidirectional growth on the (0001) surface, while incorporation of either bulky ligands or ligands with moderate affinity does not. Higher affinity of all traditionally used ligands for the (1120) surface compared to the (0001) surface also suggests that new ligands should be engineered to achieve the synthesis of novel shapes that require preferential growth on the (1120) surface.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp064051f

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Rempel, J. Y., Trout, B. L., Bawendi, M. G., & Jensen, K. F.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2006-08-23
Volume
110
Issue
36
Pages
18007-18016
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W2037013877
Cited by
167
References
3
FWCI
4.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.