The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fe@Fe2O3 Core−Shell Nanowires as Iron Reagent. 1. Efficient Degradation of Rhodamine B by a Novel Sono-Fenton Process
Abstract
In this study, Fe@Fe 2 O 3 core−shell nanowires were first used as a novel Fenton iron reagent. The nanowires were synthesized through the reduction of ferric chloride aqueous solution by sodium borohydride at ambient atmosphere, without protection of inert gases or vacuum. Rhodamine B (RhB) could be efficiently degraded in aqueous media by a novel sonochemical-assisted Fenton (sono-Fenton) system based on these Fe@Fe 2 O 3 core−shell nanowires. The RhB degradation processes were monitored by UV−vis spectroscopy and total organic carbon (TOC) analysis. Fe@Fe 2 O 3 core−shell nanowires showed much higher activity in the sono-Fenton system than other iron reagents such as commercial zerovalent iron powders (Fe 0 ), ferrous ions (Fe 2+ ), and ferric ions (Fe 3+ ). It was found that near 100% decoloration and over 60% TOC removal of RhB (5 mg·L -1 ) could be achieved in 60 min by this novel sono-Fenton system with 0.018 mol·L -1 Fe@Fe 2 O 3 core−shell nanowires. This new iron reagents before and after the sono-Fenton reaction were examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The characterizations found that the nanowires were transferred to nanotubes/nanoparticles covered with Fe 3 O 4 /Fe 2 O 3 after the sono-Fenton process. A possible mechanism of sono-Fenton degradation of RhB with Fe@Fe 2 O 3 nanowires was proposed on the basis of the experimental results. It involved homogeneous Fenton and heterogeneous Fenton oxidative degradation simultaneously. The high activity of core−shell Fe@Fe 2 O 3 nanowires and the success of their mass production make them attractive for the treatment of organic pollutants in water.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
De Laat, J., & Gallard, H. (1999) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es981171v · Cited by 749
Cited by
Li, S., Dong, G., Hailili, R., Yang, L., Li, Y., Wang, F., Zeng, Y., & Wang, C. (2016) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.004 · Cited by 697
Ai, L., Zhang, C., Li, L., & Jiang, J. (2014) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.10.056 · Cited by 584
Deng, F., Olvera-Vargas, H., Zhou, M., Qiu, S., Sirés, I., & Brillas, E. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00684 · Cited by 409
Pang, Y. L., Abdullah, A. Z., & Bhatia, S. (2011) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.049 · Cited by 364
Ai, Z., Gao, Z., Zhang, L., He, W., & Yin, J. J. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es4005202 · Cited by 338
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ai, Z., Lu, L., Li, J., Zhang, L., Qiu, J., & Wu, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-03-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4087-4093
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2042305311
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.