The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Gas Adsorption in Cu3(BTC)2: An Effective Activation Procedure
Abstract
We have improved the activation process for CuBTC [Cu 3 (BTC) 2, BTC = 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate] by extracting the N, N -dimethylformamide-solvated crystals with methanol; we identify material activated in this way as CuBTC−MeOH. This improvement allowed the activation to be performed at a much lower temperature, thus greatly mitigating the danger of reducing the copper ions. A review of the literature for H 2 adsorption in CuBTC shows that the preparation and activation process has a significant impact on the adsorption capacity, surface area, and pore volume. CuBTC−MeOH exhibits a larger pore volume and H 2 adsorption amount than any previously reported results for CuBTC. We have performed atomically detailed modeling to complement experimentally measured isotherms. Quantum effects for hydrogen adsorption in CuBTC were found to be important at 77 K. Simulations that include quantum effects are in good agreement with the experimentally measured capacity for H 2 at 77 K and high pressure. However, simulations underpredict the amount adsorbed at low pressures. We have compared the adsorption isotherms from simulations with experiments for H 2 adsorption at 77, 87, 175, and 298 K; nitrogen adsorption at 253 and 298 K; and argon adsorption at 298 and 356 K. Reasonable agreement was obtained in all cases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876
Cited by
Getman, R. B., Bae, Y.-S., Wilmer, C. E., & Snurr, R. Q. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200217c · Cited by 1,196
Using molecular simulation to characterise metal–organic frameworks for adsorption applications
Düren, T., Bae, Y.-S., & Snurr, R. Q. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b803498m · Cited by 677
Biomedical Applications of Metal Organic Frameworks
Keskin, S., & Kızılel, S. (2011) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie101312k · Cited by 607
Han, S. S., Mendoza-Cortés, J. L., & Goddard III, W. A. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b802430h · Cited by 594
Hydrogen Storage in Metal-Organic Frameworks: A Review
Langmi, H. W., Ren, J., North, B., Mathe, M., & Bessarabov, D. (2014) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.190 · Cited by 461
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, J., Culp, J. T., Natesakhawat, S., Bockrath, B. C., Zande, B., Sankar, S. G., Garberoglio, G., & Johnson, J. K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-06-12
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 9305-9313
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2001827902
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.