Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Screening Metal−Organic Framework Materials for Membrane-based Methane/Carbon Dioxide Separations

Open access
Keskin, Seda, Sholl, David S.·2007·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Metal−organic frameworks (MOF) are a diverse family of highly porous materials that have potential advantages as adsorbents and membranes for gas separations. Because the fabrication of membranes from crystalline materials is challenging, nothing is currently known about what advantages MOFs may have over more conventional materials for membrane-based separations. We use atomically detailed simulations to present the first information about the performance of MOFs as membranes for gas separations using the separation of CO 2 /CH 4 mixtures by MOF-5 as an example. Describing membrane performance requires information about both mixture adsorption and mixture diffusion in the membrane material. Our results show that mixture effects play a crucial role in determining the performance of MOF-5 membranes under conditions relevant for natural-gas applications, indicating that modeling or experimental studies that examine only single-component gases will be insufficient to understand the properties of MOF-based membranes in practical applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp075290l

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Keskin, S., & Sholl, D. S.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2007-08-31
Volume
111
Issue
38
Pages
14055-14059
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W2069945445
Cited by
202
References
1
FWCI
51.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.