The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of Nanoscale Phase Separation on the Charge Generation Dynamics and Photovoltaic Performance of Conjugated Polymer Blends: Balancing Charge Generation and Separation
Open accessAbstract
Through controlled annealing of intimately mixed blends of the polyfluorene copolymers poly(9,9‘-dioctylfluorene- co -bis( N, N ‘-(4,butylphenyl))bis( N, N ‘-phenyl-1,4-phenylene)diamine) (PFB) and poly(9,9‘-dioctylfluorene- co -benzothiadiazole) (F8BT) we observe the change in charge generation dynamics and photovoltaic performance as the length of nanoscale phase separation is varied from 5 nm or less to greater than 40 nm. We find that device efficiency is optimized for a phase separation of ∼20 nm, significantly larger than the exciton diffusion length of ∼5−10 nm. Femtosecond time-resolved transient absorption measurements confirm that the charge generation time is longer and charge generation efficiency is lower in films with a more evolved morphology. Photoluminescence quantum efficiency is also observed to monotonically increase with annealing temperature consistent with a decrease in exciton dissociation resulting from a coarsening of phases. Using a Monte Carlo model of exciton diffusion and dissociation in computer-simulated structures, we infer that the domains have purity of >95% and find good agreement between the observed photoluminescence quenching and measured domain sizes. Charge transport studies of single-carrier devices show that charge transport through the blend does not significantly improve as device performance improves, and photocurrent is observed to scale linearly with light intensity independent of blend morphology and device geometry. We conclude that the recombination of geminate charge pairs is limiting device performance, with the optimum phase separation of 20 nm balancing the efficiency of charge generation and charge separation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conjugated Polymer-Based Organic Solar Cells
Günes, S., Neugebauer, H., & Sariciftci, N. S. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050149z · Cited by 6,279
Markov, D. E., Amsterdam, E., Blom, P. W. M., Sieval, A. B., & Hummelen, J. C. (2005) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp0509663 · Cited by 432
Cited by
Charge Photogeneration in Organic Solar Cells
Clarke, T. M., & Durrant, J. R. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900271s · Cited by 2,372
Metadata
- Authors
- McNeill, C. R., Westenhoff, S., Groves, C., Friend, R. H., & Greenham, N. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-12-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 51
- Pages
- 19153-19160
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2064017221
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.