The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chemical Degradation of Nafion Membranes under Mimic Fuel Cell Conditions as Investigated by Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy
Abstract
A new ex situ method has been developed to mimic the degradation of the polymer membranes in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), caused by the cross-leakage of H 2 and O 2 . In this ex situ setup, it is possible to expose membranes to flows of different gases with a controlled temperature and humidity. H + -form Nafion films with and without an electrode layer (Pt) have been treated in the presence of different gases in order to simulate the anode and cathode side of a PEMFC. The changes of the chemical structure occurring during the degradation tests were primarily examined by solid-state 19 F NMR spectroscopy. For completion, liquid-state NMR studies and ion-exchange capacity measurements were performed. The molecular mobility changes of the ionomer membrane upon degradation were examined for the first time by variable-temperature 19 F NMR line-shape, T 1 and T 1ρ relaxation experiments. It was found that degradation occurs only when both H 2 and O 2 are present (condition of gas cross-leakage) and when the membrane is coated with a Pt catalyst. The chemical degradation rate is found to be highest for H 2 -rich mixtures of H 2 and O 2, which corresponds to the anode under OCV conditions. It is further shown that side-chain disintegration is very important for chemical degradation, although backbone decomposition also takes place. The temperature-dependent line-width and spectral anisotropy alterations were explained by the reduction of static disorder in the Nafion membrane. From the relaxation data, there is evidence for structural annealing, which is independent of the chemical degradation. Chemical degradation is considered to reduce the chain flexibility, as expressed by smaller motional amplitudes, most probably due to chain cross-linking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advanced materials for improved PEMFC performance and life
Curtin, D. E., Lousenberg, R. D., Henry, T. J., Tangeman, P. C., & Tisack, M. E. (2004) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.01.023 · Cited by 786
Zhou, C., Guerra, M. A., Qiu, Z.-M., Zawodzinski, & Schiraldi, D. A. (2007) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma071603z · Cited by 149
Cited by
Ren, P., Pei, P., Li, Y., Wu, Z., Chen, D., & Huang, S. (2020) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100859 · Cited by 737
Zatoń, M., Rozière, J., & Jones, D. J. (2017) · Sustainable Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1039/c7se00038c · Cited by 435
Wong, K. H., & Kjeang, E. (2015) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201402957 · Cited by 131
Kim, T.-H., Yi, J.-Y., Jung, C.-Y., Jeong, E., & Yi, S.-C. (2017) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.015 · Cited by 127
Futter, G. A., Latz, A., & Jahnke, T. (2019) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.10.085 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghassemzadeh, L., Kreuer, K.-D., Maier, J., & Müller, K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-08-05
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 34
- Pages
- 14635-14645
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2006363943
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemical Degradation of Nafion Membranes under Mimic Fuel Cell Conditions as Investigated by Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp102533v
- The paper
- Ghassemzadeh, L., Kreuer, K.-D., Maier, J., & Müller, K. (2010). Chemical Degradation of Nafion Membranes under Mimic Fuel Cell Conditions as Investigated by Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp102533v
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.