The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating the Hydrogen Bond Energy
Abstract
First, different approaches to detect hydrogen bonds and to evaluate their energies are introduced newly or are extended. Supermolecular interaction energies of 256 dimers, each containing one single hydrogen bond, were correlated to various descriptors by a fit function depending both on the donor and acceptor atoms of the hydrogen bond. On the one hand, descriptors were orbital-based parameters as the two-center or three-center shared electron number, products of ionization potentials and shared electron numbers, and the natural bond orbital interaction energy. On the other hand, integral descriptors examined were the acceptor-proton distance, the hydrogen bond angle, and the IR frequency shift of the donor-proton stretching vibration. Whereas an interaction energy dependence on 1/r(3.8) was established, no correlation was found for the angle. Second, the fit functions are applied to hydrogen bonds in polypeptides, amino acid dimers, and water cluster, thus their reliability is demonstrated. Employing the fit functions to assign intramolecular hydrogen bond energies in polypeptides, several side chain CH...O and CH...N hydrogen bonds were detected on the fly. Also, the fit functions describe rather well intermolecular hydrogen bonds in amino acid dimers and the cooperativity of hydrogen bond energies in water clusters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
Cited by
TRAVIS - A Free Analyzer and Visualizer for Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Trajectories
Brehm, M., & Kirchner, B. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci200217w · Cited by 1,375
Self-citationDefining the hydrogen bond: An account (IUPAC Technical Report)
Arunan, E., Desiraju, G. R., Klein, R. A., Sadlej, J., Scheiner, S., Alkorta, I., Clary, D. C., Crabtree, R. H., Dannenberg, J. J., Hobza, P., et al. (2011) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac-rep-10-01-01 · Cited by 1,021
π-π stacking interactions: Non-negligible forces for stabilizing porous supramolecular frameworks
Deng, J.-H., Luo, J., Mao, Y.-L., Lai, S., Gong, Y.-N., Zhong, D.-C., & Lu, T.-B. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aax9976 · Cited by 380
Siddiqui, S. I., Manzoor, O., Mohsin, M., & Chaudhry, S. A. (2019) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2018.11.044 · Cited by 184
Meng, A., Luan, B., Zhang, W., Zheng, Y., Guo, B., & Zhang, B. (2024) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.132911 · Cited by 51
A new paradigm for applying deep learning to protein–ligand interaction prediction
Wang, Z., Wang, S., Li, Y., Guo, J., Wei, Y., Mu, Y., Zheng, L., & Li, W. (2024) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae145 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Wendler, K., Thar, J., Zahn, S., & Kirchner, B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-08-13
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 35
- Pages
- 9529-9536
- ISSN
- 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5215
- OpenAlex
- W2094395502
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.