The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Photocatalytic Comparison of TiO2 Nanoparticles and Electrospun TiO2 Nanofibers: Effects of Mesoporosity and Interparticle Charge Transfer
Abstract
The development of a high-efficiency TiO 2 photocatalyst is of great importance to a variety of solar light conversion and application fields; the desired high efficiency can be achieved by employing well-controlled TiO 2 nanoarchitectures. In this study, we have successfully synthesized well-ordered and aligned high surface area mesoporous TiO 2 nanofibers (TiO 2 -NF) by electrospinning of TiO 2 powder dispersed in viscous polymer solution and subsequent calcination. For comparison, TiO 2 nanoparticles (TiO 2 -NP) are also prepared from calcination of the same TiO 2 powder. The TiO 2 -NF of ca. 500 nm in diameter and a few micrometers in length consist of compactly and densely packed spherical nanoparticles of ca. 20 nm in size and have mesopores of 3−4 nm in radius. Photocatalytic comparison between TiO 2 -NF and TiO 2 -NP indicated that the former had far higher photocatalytic activities in photocurrent generation by a factor of 3 and higher hydrogen production by a factor of 7. The photocatalytic superiority of TiO 2 -NF is attributed to effects of mesoporosity and nanoparticle alignment, which could cause efficient charge separation through interparticle charge transfer along the nanofiber framework. Finally, various surface characterization experiments were conducted and included to understand the photocatalytic behaviors of TiO 2 -NF and TiO 2 -NP.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sing, K. S. W. (1985) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac198557040603 · Cited by 24,485
Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis
Hoffmann, M. R., Martin, S. T., Choi, W., & Bahnemann, D. W. (1995) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00033a004 · Cited by 18,495
Cited by
Nanoparticles meet electrospinning: recent advances and future prospects
Zhang, C.-L., & Yu, S.-H. (2014) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c3cs60426h · Cited by 665
Photoinduced charge transfer processes in solar photocatalysis based on modified TiO 2
Park, H., Kim, H.-I., Moon, G.-H., & Choi, W. (2016) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c5ee02575c · Cited by 582
Self-citationLi, K., Gao, S., Wang, Q., Xu, H., Wang, Z., Huang, B., Dai, Y., & Lu, J. (2015) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am508505n · Cited by 553
Sillanpää, M., Ncibi, M. C., & Matilainen, A. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.009 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, S. K., Kim, S., Lim, S. K., & Park, H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-09-09
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 39
- Pages
- 16475-16480
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2321616788
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.