Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protein Simulations with an Optimized Water Model: Cooperative Helix Formation and Temperature-Induced Unfolded State Collapse

Best, Robert B., Mittal, Jeetain·2010·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

A recognized shortcoming in current protein simulations is that most force fields are parametrized with relatively primitive three-site water models. Since the deficiencies of the common three-site water models in reproducing the phase diagram of water are well-known, an improved description of the solvent will be required, for example, to study proteins in molecular simulations at thermodynamic conditions other than standard temperature and pressure. Here, we combine a protein force field derived from Amber ff03 together with the highly optimized TIP4P/2005 water model, with a small backbone modification to match the population of helical states obtained with the new water model to experiment. Remarkably, we find that the resulting force field, Amber ff03w, produces a more cooperative helix-coil transition, compared with the similarly "backbone-corrected" Amber ff03* model with TIP3P water, with calculated helix propagation parameters in good agreement with the experiment. The radius of gyration for nonhelical conformations is significantly larger for Amber ff03w than for Amber ff03* and shows a collapse with increasing temperature as found in single-molecule experiments on longer proteins. The origin of the collapse appears to be a more favorable enthalpic component of the peptide-solvent interaction and is correlated with increasing turn formation, in accord with the experiment. In addition to this enhanced cooperativity, we verify that, with the new force field, replica exchange folding simulations of the GB1 hairpin and Trp cage result in folded structures, starting from completely unfolded initial conditions; simulations of folded proteins are also stable. These results together suggest that Amber ff03w (with TIP4P/2005) will be well suited for studying protein folding and properties of unfolded state and intrinsically disordered proteins over a wide range of thermodynamic conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp108618d

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Best, R. B., & Mittal, J.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2010-11-01
Volume
114
Issue
46
Pages
14916-14923
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W2321195257
Cited by
257
References
3
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.