Cited by 241Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFuel Cells and Related MaterialsCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

Nitrogen Doping Effects on Carbon Nanotubes and the Origin of the Enhanced Electrocatalytic Activity of Supported Pt for Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells

Chen, Yougui, Wang, Jiajun, Liu, Hao, Banis, Mohammad Norouzi, Li, Ruying, Sun, Xueliang, Sham, Tsun-Kong, Ye, Siyu +1 more·2011·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes (CNx) were synthesized by the floating catalyst chemical vapor deposition (FCCVD) method. Pt nanoparticles were deposited onto the two catalyst supports with the ethylene glycol reduction method. Different from CNTs that contain straight hollow tubes, CNx contain a bamboolike structure with kinks along the tubes and more surface defects. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) confirms the nitrogen atoms in the graphite matrix and reveals the chemical natures of the doped nitrogen atoms. Carbon K-edge near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) and Raman characterizations reveal higher defectiveness in CNx than CNTs. The unique structure and surface property of CNx leads to a better dispersion of Pt nanoparticles on CNx than on CNTs, as revealed by TEM images. Pt supported on CNx (Pt/CNx) exhibited a higher electrochemical surface area (ECSA) and higher catalytic activity toward oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), in comparison to Pt supported on CNTs (Pt/CNTs). Better performance of Pt/CNx than Pt/CNTs has been confirmed by single-cell fuel cell tests.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp108864y

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, Y., Wang, J., Liu, H., Banis, M. N., Li, R., Sun, X., Sham, T.-K., Ye, S., & Knights, S.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Ballard Power Systems (Canada) (CA)
Corresponding author
Sun, Xueliang
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2011-02-14
Volume
115
Issue
9
Pages
3769-3776
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W2319820982
Cited by
241
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 19
FWCI
11.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes, carbon nanotubes, platinum nanoparticles, electrocatalysis, oxygen reduction reaction, proton exchange membrane fuel cells, floating catalyst chemical vapor deposition, surface defects, platinum dispersion, electrochemically active surface area, supported catalysts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review