Cited by 38Organic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsOptical Polarization and EllipsometryOrganic Light-Emitting Diodes Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ellipsometry as a Nondestructive Depth Profiling Tool for Roll-to-Roll Manufactured Flexible Solar Cells

Open access
Madsen, Morten V., Sylvester-Hvid, Kristian O., Dastmalchi, Babak, Hingerl, Kurt, Norrman, Kion, Tromholt, Thomas, Manceau, Matthieu, Angmo, Dechan, Krebs, Frederik C.·2011·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

We show that it is possible to perform ellipsometry on large area roll-to-roll (R2R) coated solar cells on flexible substrates and further demonstrate that the slot-die coating technique employed yields the same bulk heterojunction (BHJ) film morphology and vertical phase separation as laboratory samples prepared by the spin coating technique. The solar cell device geometry was Kapton/Al/Cr/P3HT:PCBM/PEDOT:PSS/Ag. Variable angle ellipsometry was used to determine the optical dispersions of the pure phases of P3HT and PCBM allowing an effective medium approximation model to be employed. It was found that a top layer phase separation of P3HT and a vertical linear gradient of P3HT and PCBM best described the BHJ layer. The model was tested for samples of varying thickness and blend composition, model parameters including thickness (AFM), vertical composition (XPS depth profiling), and optical transmission (optical simulation and UV–visible spectroscopy comparisons) was confirmed to comply with the model. A means of quality testing and optimization of the coating procedure line scans across a R2R slot-die-coated sample over large distances (8 cm) was made giving insight into thickness and composition uniformity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp2004002

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Madsen, M. V., Sylvester-Hvid, K. O., Dastmalchi, B., Hingerl, K., Norrman, K., Tromholt, T., Manceau, M., Angmo, D., & Krebs, F. C.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
  • Solar Energy Programme, Risø National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Frederikborgsvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
  • Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
Corresponding author
Madsen, Morten V.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2011-05-10
Volume
115
Issue
21
Pages
10817-10822
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W2327787364
Cited by
38
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry C (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
Keywords
ellipsometry, roll-to-roll processing, flexible solar cells, slot-die coating, bulk heterojunction, P3HT:PCBM, vertical phase separation, effective medium theory, optical dispersion, coating uniformity, PEDOT:PSS, non-destructive characterization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review