The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DFT-Based Study on Oxygen Adsorption on Defective Graphene-Supported Pt Nanoparticles
Abstract
The structural and electronic properties of Pt 13 nanoparticles adsorbed on monovacancy defective graphene have been determined to understand oxygen adsorption on Pt nanoparticles based upon density functional theory predictions using the generalized gradient approximation. We demonstrate that a monovacancy site of graphene serves a key role as an anchoring point for Pt 13 nanoparticles, ensuring their stability on defective graphene surfaces and suggesting their enhanced catalytic activity toward the interaction with O 2 . Strong hybridization of the Pt 13 nanoparticle with the sp 2 dangling bonds of neighboring carbon atoms near the monovacancy site leads to the strong binding of the Pt 13 nanoparticle on defective graphene (−7.45 eV in adsorption energy). Upon both adsorption of the Pt 13 nanoparticle on defective graphene and O 2 on Pt 13 –defective graphene, strong charge depletion of the Pt atom at the interfaces of Pt–C and Pt–O 2 is observed. Pt 13 nanoparticles are able to donate charge to both defective graphene and O 2 . The Pt 13 –defective graphene complex shows an O 2 adsorption energy of −2.30 eV, which is weaker than the O 2 adsorption energy of −3.92 eV on a free Pt 13 nanoparticle. Considering the strong stability of the Pt nanoparticles and relatively weaker O 2 adsorption energy due to the defective graphene support, we expect that the defective graphene support may increase the catalytic activity of Pt nanoparticles compared to flat Pt metal surfaces, not only by preventing sintering of Pt nanoparticles due to the strong anchoring nature of the graphene defect sites but also by providing a balance in the O 2 binding strength that may allow for enhanced catalyst turnover.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The electronic properties of graphene
Castro Neto, A. H., Guinea, F., Peres, N. M. R., Novoselov, K. S., & Geim, A. K. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.109 · Cited by 24,803
Origin of the Overpotential for Oxygen Reduction at a Fuel-Cell Cathode
Nørskov, J. K., Rossmeisl, J., Logadottir, A., Lindqvist, L., Kitchin, J. R., Bligaard, T., & Jónsson, H. (2004) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp047349j · Cited by 13,153
Cited by
Lim, D.-H., & Wilcox, J. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp210796e · Cited by 353
Self-citationGraphene oxide incorporated functional materials: A review
Ahmad, H., Fan, M., & Hui, D. (2018) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.006 · Cited by 315
Shi, H., Auerbach, S. M., & Ramasubramaniam, A. (2016) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01288 · Cited by 50
Tian, Y., Liu, Y.-J., Zhao, J.-X., & Ding, Y.-H. (2015) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c5ra02585k · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Lim, D.-H., & Wilcox, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-11-02
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 46
- Pages
- 22742-22747
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2009390158
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.