The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molar Extinction Coefficient of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes
Abstract
The molar extinction coefficient of single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) is determined using fluorescence tagging, as well as atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging, which facilitate the correlation of nanotube concentrations with absorption spectra. Tagging of SWNTs is achieved using fluorescence-labeled single-strand DNA oligomers as the dispersion additive, while AFM imaging is used to determine the mass of SWNTs in the retentate of vacuum-filtered colloidal SWNT suspensions. The resulting absorption cross section for the first exciton transition of (6,5) nanotubes of 1.7 × 10 –17 cm 2 per C-atom corresponds to an extinction coefficient of (4400 ± 1000) M –1 ·cm –1, which is equivalent to an oscillator strength of 0.010 per carbon atom.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fine Structure Constant Defines Visual Transparency of Graphene
Nair, R. R., Blake, P., Grigorenko, A. N., Novoselov, K. S., Booth, T. J., Stauber, T., Peres, N. M. R., & Geim, A. K. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1156965 · Cited by 9,084
Cited by
Strong light–matter interactions: a new direction within chemistry
Hertzog, M., Wang, M., Mony, J., & Börjesson, K. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00193f · Cited by 444
In vivo biosensing via tissue-localizable near-infrared-fluorescent single-walled carbon nanotubes
Iverson, N. M., Barone, P. W., Shandell, M., Trudel, L. J., Sen, S., Sen, F., Ivanov, V., Atolia, E., Farias, E., McNicholas, T. P., et al. (2013) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2013.222 · Cited by 379
Antaris, A. L., Robinson, J. T., Yaghi, O. K., Hong, G., Diao, S., Luong, R., & Dai, H. (2013) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn4006472 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Schöppler, F., Mann, C., Hain, T. C., Neubauer, F. M., Privitera, G., Bonaccorso, F., Chu, D., Ferrari, A. C., & Hertel, T.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-07-08
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 30
- Pages
- 14682-14686
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W1971313361
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
