The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding CO2 Adsorption in CuBTC MOF: Comparing Combined DFT–ab Initio Calculations with Microcalorimetry Experiments
Abstract
A combined experimental and theoretical investigation of CO 2 adsorption in the metal–organic framework CuBTC is presented. Adsorption enthalpies were measured as a function of coverage up to 13 mmol g –1 adsorbed amount (corresponding roughly to CO 2 /Cu = 5:2) by a Tian–Calvet-type microcalorimeter. Experimetal data are interpreted based on accurate calculations employing a combined DFT–ab initio computational scheme. CO 2 molecules adsorb preferentially on coordinatively unsaturated sites for coverages below CO 2 /Cu = 1:1; at higher coverages (up to CO 2 /Cu = 5:3), CO 2 adsorbs in cage window sites; and at higher coverages, the sites in cage centers and in large cages start to be occupied. Experimental adsorption enthalpies are almost constant (−29 kJ mol –1 ) up to the CO 2 /Cu = 5:3 coverage, suggesting a homogeneity of adsorption sites. However, calculations clearly show that adsorption sites in CuBTC are rather heterogeneous. The experimentally observed independence of adsorption enthalpies with respect to coverage is due to the cancellation of two effects: the decrease in the adsorbate–adsorbent interaction is compensated by an increase in the lateral interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876
Cited by
CO2 Capture and Separations Using MOFs: Computational and Experimental Studies
Yu, J., Xie, L.-H., Li, J.-R., Ma, Y., Seminario, J. M., & Balbuena, P. B. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00626 · Cited by 1,047
Kökçam-Demir, Ü., Goldman, A., Esrafili, L., Gharib, M., Morsali, A., Weingart, O., & Janiak, C. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00609e · Cited by 895
Understanding the Effect of Water on CO2 Adsorption
Kolle, J. M., Fayaz, M., & Sayari, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00762 · Cited by 523
Quantum-Chemical Characterization of the Properties and Reactivities of Metal–Organic Frameworks
Odoh, S. O., Cramer, C. J., Truhlar, D. G., & Gagliardi, L. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500551h · Cited by 306
Controlling the Adsorption Enthalpy of CO2 in Zeolites by Framework Topology and Composition
Grajciar, L., Čejka, J., Zukal, A., Otero Areán, C., Turnes Palomino, G., & Nachtigall, P. (2012) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201200270 · Cited by 112
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Grajciar, L., Wiersum, A. D., Llewellyn, P. L., Chang, J.-S., & Nachtigall, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-08-18
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 17925-17933
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2322229116
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding CO2 Adsorption in CuBTC MOF: Comparing Combined DFT–ab Initio Calculations with Microcalorimetry Experiments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp206002d
- The paper
- Grajciar, L., Wiersum, A. D., Llewellyn, P. L., Chang, J.-S., & Nachtigall, P. (2011). Understanding CO2 Adsorption in CuBTC MOF: Comparing Combined DFT–ab Initio Calculations with Microcalorimetry Experiments. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp206002d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.