Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 365

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metal–Support Interactions between Nanosized Pt and Metal Oxides (WO3 and TiO2) Studied Using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy

Lewera, Adam, Timperman, Laure, Roguska, Agata, Alonso-Vante, Nicolas·2011·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

Platinum nanoparticles have been selectively deposited on composites of titanium oxide-carbon and tungsten oxide-carbon. Selectivity of the deposition made it possible to investigate changes in electronic properties of both platinum and oxide support, induced by the so-called strong metal–support interactions (SMSI). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used, and changes in binding energy of Pt 4f, Ti 2p, and W 4f core-levels and Pt 4f peak asymmetry were determined. These parameters allowed us to state the changes in local electron density, when Pt is deposited on oxide support. In all cases the binding energy of the Pt 4f signal for platinum deposited on an oxide support was significantly lower in comparison to samples where Pt was solely supported onto carbon. The increase in Pt 4f XPS signal asymmetry was observed. This suggests an increased electron density on Pt. No electron donor could be identified from the analysis of the oxide supports. To explain the observed data, at least two effects must be considered: (i) alloy formation between Pt and the oxide support and (ii) partial charge transfer from substrate to Pt, which can be correlated to previously observed increased activity toward oxygen reduction reaction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp2068446

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Yixuan C., 1993, J. Mol. Catal., 21, 275, 10.1016/0304-5102(93)80127-G · doi:10.1016/0304-5102(93)80127-g
  2. Chen B. H., 1982, J. Phys. Chem., 86, 3534, 10.1021/j100215a010 · doi:10.1021/j100215a010
  3. Kulesza P. J., 1997, J. Electrochem. Soc., 144, 1911, 10.1149/1.1837720 · doi:10.1149/1.1837720
  4. Sugimura H., 1993, Chem. Lett., 22, 379, 10.1246/cl.1993.379 · doi:10.1246/cl.1993.379
  5. Moulder J. F., 1995, Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. A Reference Book of Standard Spectra for Identification and Interpretation of XPS Spectra
  6. Davis D. G., 1960, Talanta, 3, 335, 10.1016/0039-9140(60)80044-6 · doi:10.1016/0039-9140(60)80044-6
  7. Lewera A., 2007, Chem. Phys. Lett., 447, 39, 10.1016/j.cplett.2007.08.068 · doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2007.08.068

Cited by

See all 365

Metadata

Authors
Lewera, A., Timperman, L., Roguska, A., & Alonso-Vante, N.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2011-09-26
Volume
115
Issue
41
Pages
20153-20159
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W2314069515
Cited by
365
References
37
FWCI
10.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metal–Support Interactions between Nanosized Pt and Metal Oxides (WO3 and TiO2) Studied Using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp2068446
The paper
Lewera, A., Timperman, L., Roguska, A., & Alonso-Vante, N. (2011). Metal–Support Interactions between Nanosized Pt and Metal Oxides (WO3 and TiO2) Studied Using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp2068446

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.