Cited by 35Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Further Evidence for the Likely Completeness of the Library of Solved Single Domain Protein Structures

Open access
Skolnick, Jeffrey, Zhou, Hongyi, Brylinski, Michal·2012·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

Recent studies questioned whether the Protein Data Bank (PDB) contains all compact, single domain protein structures. Here, we show that all quasi-spherical, QS, random protein structures devoid of secondary structure are in the PDB and are excellent templates for all native PDB proteins up to 250 residues. Because QS templates have a similar global contour as native, TASSER can refine 98% (90%) of those whose TM-score is 0.4 (0.35) to structures greater than or equal to the 0.5 TM-score threshold (0.74 (0.64) mean TM-score) for CATH/SCOP assignment. On the basis of this and the fact that, at a TM-score of 0.4, 83% (90%) of all (internal) core secondary structure elements are recovered, a 0.40 TM-score is an appropriate fold similarity assignment threshold. Despite the claims of Taylor, Trovato, and Zhou that many of their structures lack a PDB counterpart, using fr-TM-align, at a 0.45 (0.5) TM-score threshold, essentially all (most) are found in the PDB. Thus, the conclusion that the PDB is likely complete is further supported.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp211052j

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skolnick, J., Zhou, H., & Brylinski, M.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Center for the Study of Systems Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 250 14th Street NW, Atlanta, Georgia 30318, United States
Corresponding author
Skolnick, Jeffrey
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2012-02-13
Volume
116
Issue
23
Pages
6654-6664
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W2081208252
Cited by
35
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM037408, GM-48835, R01GM048835)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
single-domain proteins, TM-score
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Models, Molecular, Proteins, Protein Structure, Secondary, Peptide Library, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review