The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Large Ultrathin Anatase TiO2 Nanosheets with Exposed {001} Facets on Graphene for Enhanced Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity
Abstract
Tailored synthesis of well-defined anatase TiO 2 nanocrystals with a high percentage of reactive facets has attracted widespread attention due to the scientific and technological importance. Here, high-quality nanosized anatase ultrathin TiO 2 nanosheets, mainly dominated by {001} facets, were grown on graphene nanosheets by a simple one-pot solvothermal synthetic route. The obtained samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The photocatalytic activity of as-prepared TiO 2 /graphene composites for degradation of methylene blue (MB) under visible-light irradiation at λ ≥ 400 nm was investigated. The results show that TiO 2 /graphene nanocomposites have a higher photocatalytic activity than pure TiO 2 and P25. This enhanced photocatalytic activity suggests that the photoinduced electrons in TiO 2 prefer transferring to the graphene efficiently. As a consequence, the electron transfer via Ti–O–C between TiO 2 and C interaction greatly retards the recombination of photoinduced charge carriers and prolongs the carrier lifetime, thus contributing to the enhancement of photocatalytic performance. The amount of graphene is an important factor affecting the photocatalytic activity of TiO 2 /graphene nanocomposites. The optimum amount of graphene is ca. 1 wt %, at which the TiO 2 /graphene sample displays the highest reactivity. Furthermore, the photodegradation rate does not show an obvious decrease during five successive cycles, indicating that our TiO 2 /graphene nanocomposites are stable visible-light photocatalysts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene
Novoselov, K. S., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V., Jiang, D., Katsnelson, M. I., Grigorieva, I. V., Dubonos, S. V., & Firsov, A. A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04233 · Cited by 21,611
Graphene: Status and Prospects
Geim, A. K. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158877 · Cited by 13,942
Fine Structure Constant Defines Visual Transparency of Graphene
Nair, R. R., Blake, P., Grigorenko, A. N., Novoselov, K. S., Booth, T. J., Stauber, T., Peres, N. M. R., & Geim, A. K. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1156965 · Cited by 9,084
The surface science of titanium dioxide
Diebold, U. (2003) · Surface Science Reports · doi:10.1016/s0167-5729(02)00100-0 · Cited by 7,944
Liu, J., Bai, H., Wang, Y., Liu, Z., Zhang, X., & Sun, D. D. (2010) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201001391 · Cited by 776
Preparation of graphene–TiO 2 composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity
Zhou, K., Zhu, Y., Yang, X., Jiang, X., & Li, C. (2011) · New J. Chem. · doi:10.1039/c0nj00623h · Cited by 576
Cited by
Titanium Dioxide Crystals with Tailored Facets
Liu, G., Yang, H. G., Pan, J., Yang, Y. Q., Lu, G. Q. (., & Cheng, H.-M. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400621z · Cited by 1,084
Kapilashrami, M., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y.-S., Hagfeldt, A., & Guo, J. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5000893 · Cited by 508
Visible Photocatalytic Activity Enhancement of ZnWO4 by Graphene Hybridization
Bai, X., Wang, L., & Zhu, Y. (2012) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs3005852 · Cited by 283
Dey, D., Shafi, T., Chowdhury, S., Dubey, B. K., & Sen, R. (2024) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141164 · Cited by 65
Thakur, S., & Karak, N. (2015) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c5ta02162f · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, W.-S., Wang, D.-H., Qu, W.-G., Lu, L.-Q., & Xu, A.-W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-09-11
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 19893-19901
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2331310302
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 14.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.