The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Mechanism of Nonaqueous Li–O2 Electrochemistry on C and Its Kinetic Overpotentials: Some Implications for Li–Air Batteries
Abstract
Quantitative differential electrochemical mass spectrometry and cyclic voltammetry have been combined to probe possible mechanisms and the kinetic overpotentials, responsible for discharge and charge in a Li–O 2 battery, using C as the cathode and an electrolyte based on dimethoxyethane as the solvent. Previous spectroscopy experiments (X-ray diffraction, μRaman, IR, XPS) have shown that Li 2 O 2 is the principle product formed during Li–O 2 discharge using this electrolyte/cathode combination. At all discharge potentials and charge potentials <4.0 V, the observed electrochemistry is ∼2e – /O 2 consumed or produced, also implying that Li 2 O 2 is the dominant thermodynamically stable species formed and consumed in the electrochemistry. No evidence exists at any potential for formation of stable LiO 2 (1e – /O 2 ) or Li 2 O (4e – /O 2 ) during discharge. At charging potentials >4.0 V, the electrochemistry requires significantly more than 2e – /O 2, and we take this as evidence for electrolyte decomposition. We find that sequential concerted (Li + + e – ) ion transfers to/from adsorbed O 2 * and LiO 2 * to produce/consume Li 2 O 2 is the mechanism that is most compatible with these experiments. The kinetic overpotentials are extremely low relative to aqueous O 2 reduction and evolution, and this implies that in principle a discharge–charge Li–O 2 cycle is possible with high voltaic efficiency (∼85%) if electrolyte and cathode stability issues are resolved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Origin of the Overpotential for Oxygen Reduction at a Fuel-Cell Cathode
Nørskov, J. K., Rossmeisl, J., Logadottir, A., Lindqvist, L., Kitchin, J. R., Bligaard, T., & Jónsson, H. (2004) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp047349j · Cited by 13,153
Cited by
Current density dependence of peroxide formation in the Li–O2 battery and its effect on charge
Adams, B. D., Radtke, C., Black, R., Trudeau, M. L., Zaghib, K., & Nazar, L. F. (2013) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c3ee40697k · Cited by 678
A review of cathode materials and structures for rechargeable lithium–air batteries
Ma, Z., Yuan, X., Li, L., Ma, Z.-F., Wilkinson, D. P., Zhang, L., & Zhang, J. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c5ee00838g · Cited by 485
Critical Challenges in Rechargeable Aprotic Li–O2 Batteries
Feng, N., He, P., & Zhou, H. (2016) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201502303 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- McCloskey, B. D., Scheffler, R., Speidel, A., Girishkumar, G., & Luntz, A. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-11-05
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 45
- Pages
- 23897-23905
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2050992939
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.