The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward a Molecular Understanding of Energetics in Li–S Batteries Using Nonaqueous Electrolytes: A High-Level Quantum Chemical Study
Abstract
The Li–S battery (secondary cell or redox flow) technology is a promising future alternative to the present lithium intercalation-based energy storage, and, therefore, a molecular level understanding of the chemical processes and properties such as stability of intermediates, reactivity of polysulfides, and reactivity toward the nonaqueous electrolytes in the Li–S batteries is of great interest. In this paper, quantum chemical methods (G4MP2, MP2, and B3LYP) were utilized to compute reduction potentials of lithium polysulfides and polysulfide molecular clusters, energetics of disproportionation and association reactions of likely intermediates, and their reactions with ether-based electrolytes. Based on the computed reaction energetics in solution, a probable mechanism during the discharge process for polysulfide anions and lithium polysulfides in solution is proposed and likely intermediates such as S 4 2–, S 3 2–, S 2 2–, and S 3 1– radical were identified. Additionally, the stability and reactivity of propylene carbonate and tetraglyme solvent molecules were assessed against the above-mentioned intermediates and other reactive species by computing the reaction energetics required to initiate the solvent decomposition reactions in solution. Calculations suggest that the propylene carbonate molecule is unstable against the polysulfide anions such as S 2 2–, S 3 2–, and S 4 2– (Δ H † < 0.8 eV) and highly reactive toward Li 2 S 2 and Li 2 S 3 . Even though the tetraglyme solvent molecule exhibits increased stability toward polysulfide anions compared to propylene carbonate, this molecule too is vulnerable to nucleophilic attack from Li 2 S 2 and Li 2 S 3 species in solutions. Hence, long-term stability of the ether molecules is unlikely if a high concentration of these reactive intermediates is present in the Li–S energy storage systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thackeray, M. M., Wolverton, C., & Isaacs, E. D. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21892e · Cited by 2,515
Cited by
Establishing reaction networks in the 16-electron sulfur reduction reaction
Liu, R., Wei, Z., Peng, L., Zhang, L., Zohar, A., Schoeppner, R., Wang, P., Wan, C., Zhu, D., Liu, H., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06918-4 · Cited by 573
Progress in Mechanistic Understanding and Characterization Techniques of Li‐S Batteries
Xu, R., Lu, J., & Amine, K. (2015) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201500408 · Cited by 507
Burning lithium in CS2 for high-performing compact Li2S–graphene nanocapsules for Li–S batteries
Tan, G., Xu, R., Xing, Z., Yuan, Y., Lu, J., Wen, J., Liu, C., Ma, L., Zhan, C., Liu, Q., et al. (2017) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2017.90 · Cited by 444
Self-citationA review of recent developments in rechargeable lithium–sulfur batteries
Kang, W., Deng, N., Ju, J., Li, Q., Wu, D., Ma, X., Li, L., Naebe, M., & Cheng, B. (2016) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c6nr04923k · Cited by 391
Steudel, R., & Chivers, T. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00826d · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Assary, R. S., Curtiss, L. A., & Moore, J. S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-05-23
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 11545-11558
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2324704560
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.