Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 573

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Establishing reaction networks in the 16-electron sulfur reduction reaction

Open access
Liu, Rongli, Wei, Ziyang, Peng, Lele, Zhang, Leyuan, Zohar, Arava, Schoeppner, Rachel, Wang, Peiqi, Wan, Chengzhang, Zhu, Dan, Liu, Haotian, Wang, Zhaozong, Tolbert, Sarah H., Dunn, Bruce, Huang, Yu, Sautet, Philippe, Duan, Xiangfeng·2024·Nature

Abstract

The sulfur reduction reaction (SRR) plays a central role in high-capacity lithium sulfur (Li-S) batteries. The SRR involves an intricate, 16-electron conversion process featuring multiple lithium polysulfide intermediates and reaction branches1–3. Establishing the complex reaction network is essential for rational tailoring of the SRR for improved Li-S batteries, but represents a daunting challenge4–6. Herein we systematically investigate the electrocatalytic SRR to decipher its network using the nitrogen, sulfur, dual-doped holey graphene framework as a model electrode to understand the role of electrocatalysts in acceleration of conversion kinetics. Combining cyclic voltammetry, in situ Raman spectroscopy and density functional theory calculations, we identify and directly profile the key intermediates (S8, Li2S8, Li2S6, Li2S4 and Li2S) at varying potentials and elucidate their conversion pathways. Li2S4 and Li2S6 were predominantly observed, in which Li2S4 represents the key electrochemical intermediate dictating the overall SRR kinetics. Li2S6, generated (consumed) through a comproportionation (disproportionation) reaction, does not directly participate in electrochemical reactions but significantly contributes to the polysulfide shuttling process. We found that the nitrogen, sulfur dual-doped holey graphene framework catalyst could help accelerate polysulfide conversion kinetics, leading to faster depletion of soluble lithium polysulfides at higher potential and hence mitigating the polysulfide shuttling effect and boosting output potential. These results highlight the electrocatalytic approach as a promising strategy for tackling the fundamental challenges regarding Li-S batteries. We investigate the mechanism underlying the sulfur reduction reaction that plays a central role in high-capacity lithium sulfur batteries, highlighting the electrocatalytic approach as a promising strategy for tackling the fundamental challenges associated with these batteries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-023-06918-4

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Metadata

Authors
Liu, R., Wei, Z., Peng, L., Zhang, L., Zohar, A., Schoeppner, R., Wang, P., Wan, C., Zhu, D., Liu, H., Wang, Z., Tolbert, S. H., Dunn, B., Huang, Y., Sautet, P., & Duan, X.
Venue
Nature
Published
2024-01-31
Volume
626
Issue
7997
Pages
98-104
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4391383682
Cited by
573
References
40
FWCI
59.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Establishing reaction networks in the 16-electron sulfur reduction reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41586-023-06918-4
The paper
Liu, R., Wei, Z., Peng, L., Zhang, L., Zohar, A., Schoeppner, R., Wang, P., Wan, C., Zhu, D., Liu, H., Wang, Z., Tolbert, S. H., Dunn, B., Huang, Y., Sautet, P., & Duan, X. (2024). Establishing reaction networks in the 16-electron sulfur reduction reaction. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06918-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.