The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Establishing reaction networks in the 16-electron sulfur reduction reaction
Open accessAbstract
The sulfur reduction reaction (SRR) plays a central role in high-capacity lithium sulfur (Li-S) batteries. The SRR involves an intricate, 16-electron conversion process featuring multiple lithium polysulfide intermediates and reaction branches1–3. Establishing the complex reaction network is essential for rational tailoring of the SRR for improved Li-S batteries, but represents a daunting challenge4–6. Herein we systematically investigate the electrocatalytic SRR to decipher its network using the nitrogen, sulfur, dual-doped holey graphene framework as a model electrode to understand the role of electrocatalysts in acceleration of conversion kinetics. Combining cyclic voltammetry, in situ Raman spectroscopy and density functional theory calculations, we identify and directly profile the key intermediates (S8, Li2S8, Li2S6, Li2S4 and Li2S) at varying potentials and elucidate their conversion pathways. Li2S4 and Li2S6 were predominantly observed, in which Li2S4 represents the key electrochemical intermediate dictating the overall SRR kinetics. Li2S6, generated (consumed) through a comproportionation (disproportionation) reaction, does not directly participate in electrochemical reactions but significantly contributes to the polysulfide shuttling process. We found that the nitrogen, sulfur dual-doped holey graphene framework catalyst could help accelerate polysulfide conversion kinetics, leading to faster depletion of soluble lithium polysulfides at higher potential and hence mitigating the polysulfide shuttling effect and boosting output potential. These results highlight the electrocatalytic approach as a promising strategy for tackling the fundamental challenges regarding Li-S batteries. We investigate the mechanism underlying the sulfur reduction reaction that plays a central role in high-capacity lithium sulfur batteries, highlighting the electrocatalytic approach as a promising strategy for tackling the fundamental challenges associated with these batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
Hohenberg, P., & Kohn, W. (1964) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.136.b864 · Cited by 53,541
Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals
Kresse, G., & Hafner, J. (1993) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.47.558 · Cited by 45,727
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
A highly ordered nanostructured carbon–sulphur cathode for lithium–sulphur batteries
Ji, X., Lee, K. T., & Nazar, L. F. (2009) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2460 · Cited by 5,988
Rechargeable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Manthiram, A., Fu, Y., Chung, S.-H., Zu, C., & Su, Y.-S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500062v · Cited by 4,665
Strongly Constrained and Appropriately Normed Semilocal Density Functional
Sun, J., Ruzsinszky, A., & Perdew, J. P. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.036402 · Cited by 3,596
Self-Assembled Graphene Hydrogel via a One-Step Hydrothermal Process
Xu, Y., Sheng, K., Li, C., & Shi, G. (2010) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn101187z · Cited by 3,251
Implicit solvation model for density-functional study of nanocrystal surfaces and reaction pathways
Mathew, K., Sundararaman, R., Letchworth-Weaver, K., Arias, T. A., & Hennig, R. G. (2014) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4865107 · Cited by 3,196
Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Electrochemistry, Materials, and Prospects
Yin, Y., Xin, S., Guo, Y., & Wan, L. (2013) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201304762 · Cited by 2,707
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, R., Wei, Z., Peng, L., Zhang, L., Zohar, A., Schoeppner, R., Wang, P., Wan, C., Zhu, D., Liu, H., Wang, Z., Tolbert, S. H., Dunn, B., Huang, Y., Sautet, P., & Duan, X.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2024-01-31
- Volume
- 626
- Issue
- 7997
- Pages
- 98-104
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W4391383682
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 59.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Establishing reaction networks in the 16-electron sulfur reduction reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41586-023-06918-4
- The paper
- Liu, R., Wei, Z., Peng, L., Zhang, L., Zohar, A., Schoeppner, R., Wang, P., Wan, C., Zhu, D., Liu, H., Wang, Z., Tolbert, S. H., Dunn, B., Huang, Y., Sautet, P., & Duan, X. (2024). Establishing reaction networks in the 16-electron sulfur reduction reaction. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06918-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.