The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Benchmarking Quantum Chemical Methods for the Calculation of Molecular Dipole Moments and Polarizabilities
Open accessAbstract
The calculation of molecular electric moments, polarizabilities, and electrostatic potentials is a widespread application of quantum chemistry. Although a range of wave function and density functional theory (DFT) methods have been applied in these calculations, combined with a variety of basis sets, there has not been a comprehensive evaluation of how accurate these methods are. To benchmark the accuracy of these methods, the dipole moments and polarizabilities of a set of 46 molecules were calculated using a broad set of quantum chemical methods and basis sets. Wave function methods Hartree-Fock (HF), second-order Møller-Plesset (MP2), and coupled cluster-singles and doubles (CCSD) were evaluated, along with the PBE, TPSS, TPSSh, PBE0, B3LYP, M06, and B2PLYP DFT functionals. The cc-pVDZ, cc-pVTZ, aug-cc-pVDZ, aug-cc-pVTZ, and Sadlej cc-pVTZ basis sets were tested. The aug-cc-pVDZ, Sadlej cc-pVTZ, and aug-cc-pVTZ basis sets all yield results with comparable accuracy, with the aug-cc-pVTZ calculations being the most accurate. CCSD, MP2, or hybrid DFT methods using the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set are all able to predict dipole moments with RMSD errors in the 0.12-0.13 D range and polarizabilities with RMSD errors in the 0.30-0.38 Å(3) range. Calculations using Hartree-Fock theory systematically overestimated dipole moments and underestimate polarizabilities. The pure DFT functionals included in this study (PBE and TPSS) slightly underestimate dipole moments and overestimate polarizability. Polarization anisotropy and implications for charge fitting are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 · Cited by 215,824
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
Dunning, T. H. (1989) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.456153 · Cited by 31,648
Zhao, Y., & Truhlar, D. G. (2008) · Theoretical Chemistry Accounts · doi:10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x · Cited by 30,302
Development and testing of a general amber force field
Wang, J., Wolf, R. M., Caldwell, J. W., Kollman, P. A., & Case, D. A. (2004) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20035 · Cited by 19,506
Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model
Adamo, C., & Barone, V. (1999) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.478522 · Cited by 19,042
Note on an Approximation Treatment for Many-Electron Systems
Møller, C., & Plesset, M. S. (1934) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.46.618 · Cited by 14,614
Woon, D. E., & Dunning, T. H. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464303 · Cited by 9,493
Intermolecular and Surface Forces
(2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2011-0-05119-0 · Cited by 8,968
Tao, J., Perdew, J. P., Staroverov, V. N., & Scuseria, G. E. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.146401 · Cited by 7,093
Cited by
Prediction Errors of Molecular Machine Learning Models Lower than Hybrid DFT Error
Faber, F. A., Hutchison, L., Huang, B., Gilmer, J., Schoenholz, S. S., Dahl, G. E., Vinyals, O., Kearnes, S., Riley, P. F., & von Lilienfeld, O. A. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00577 · Cited by 651
Jackson, P. A., Widen, J. C., Harki, D. A., & Brummond, K. M. (2017) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00788 · Cited by 588
Xu, Y., Cantwell, L., Molosh, A. I., Plant, L. D., Gazgalis, D., Fitz, S. D., Dustrude, E. T., Yang, Y., Kawano, T., Garai, S., et al. (2020) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra119.011527 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Hickey, A. L., & Rowley, C. N.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-05-09
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 3678-3687
- ISSN
- 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5215
- OpenAlex
- W2324930475
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 9.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.