The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Li-Ion Intercalation in Thermal Oxide Thin Films of MoO3 as Studied by XPS, RBS, and NRA
Abstract
XPS, RBS, and NRA have been combined to study the mechanisms of Li-ion electrochemical intercalation in MoO 3 thin films prepared by thermal oxidation of molybdenum metal. A direct anaerobic and anhydrous transfer was used from a glovebox (O 2 and H 2 O < 1 ppm), where the samples were electrochemically treated at selected potentials between 1.7 and 3.2 V versus Li + /Li, to the XPS analysis chamber. The thermal oxide film grown at T = 450 ± 10 °C and P(O 2 ) = 100 ± 10 mbar for t = 5 min consisted of a 20 nm thick MoO 3 outer layer overlying a 13 nm thick inner layer of lower oxides (Mo 2 O 5 and MoO 2 ). Combined RBS/NRA analysis allowed the dosing of intercalated lithium and the determination of the composition of the lithiated phases. Li 0.50 MoO 3, Li 1.20 MoO 3, and Li 0.21 MoO 3 were obtained after intercalation at 2.58 and 1.73 V and deintercalation at 3.2 V, respectively, showing that ∼1.2 mol of Li can be initially intercalated in the potential range 1.7−3.2 V (capacity of 223 mA h/g), and ∼0.2 mol of Li per mol of MoO 3 is trapped in the oxide matrix after the initial stages of intercalation. The XP Mo3d core level spectra evidenced the reduction of Mo 6+ ions to Mo 5+ ions after intercalation at 2.58 V and further to Mo 5+ and Mo 4+ ions after intercalation at 1.73 V with resulting Mo 6+ /Mo 5+ /Mo 4+ ratios of 53:47:00 at % and 37:39:24 at %, respectively. Reoxidation of molybdenum is observed after deintercalation but 40 at % Mo 5+ subsist at 3.2 V due to the trapping of lithium strongly bonded to the oxide matrix. The Li1s core level (at E B = 55.80 eV) is most intense at 1.73 V and does not vanish at 3.2 V. Broadening of the Mo3d core level peaks are assigned to the distortion of the oxide matrix. Changes of the electronic structure after intercalation result from the occupation of the Mo4d states (at E B = 1.0 eV) originally empty in the pristine oxide. The XP C1s and O1s core level spectra show the irreversible formation of a solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer including lithium carbonate and Li-alkoxides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ageing mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries
Vetter, J., Novák, P., Wagner, M. R., Veit, C., Möller, K.-C., Besenhard, J. O., Winter, M., Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M., Vogler, C., & Hammouche, A. (2005) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.006 · Cited by 3,987
Cited by
Nanostructured metal oxide-based materials as advanced anodes for lithium-ion batteries
Wu, H. B., Chen, J. S., Hng, H. H., & Wen (David) Lou, X. (2012) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c2nr11966h · Cited by 1,082
Nanostructured Mo-based electrode materials for electrochemical energy storage
Hu, X., Zhang, W., Liu, X., Mei, Y., & Huang, Y. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00350k · Cited by 711
Cui, W., Cheng, N., Liu, Q., Ge, C., Asiri, A. M., & Sun, X. (2014) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs5005294 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Światowska-Mrowiecka, J., de Diesbach, S., Maurice, V., Zanna, S., Klein, L., Briand, E., Vickridge, I., & Marcus, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-06-28
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 11050-11058
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2043812679
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.