Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 230

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular Dynamics Study on Nanoparticle Diffusion in Polymer Melts: A Test of the Stokes−Einstein Law

Liu, Jun, Cao, Dapeng, Zhang, Liqun·2008·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations are used to investigate the diffusion process of nanoparticles in polymer melts. The effects of size, concentration, and mass of the particle, chain length, and polymer−particle interaction on the diffusion of particles in polymer melts are also explored. Our simulated results indicate that the gyration radius of the polymer chain is the key factor determining the validity of the Stokes−Eintsein(SE) relation in describing the particle diffusion at infinite dilution. When the particle size is larger than the gyration radius of the polymer chain, the SE formula can predict the particle diffusion in the polymer melts correctly, and the particle diffusion does not show mass dependence. When the particle size is smaller than the gyration radius of the polymer chain, however, the SE equation becomes invalid in the prediction of particle diffusion, because particle diffusion is exactly related to the nanoviscosity rather than the macroviscosity used in the SE formula. Furthermore, it is also found that the diffusion coefficient of the particle is inversely proportional to the cube of its hydrodynamic radius. In this regime where the particle size is smaller than the gyration radius of the polymer, particle diffusion is independent of the chain length or molecular weight of the polymer, but dependent on the particle mass. In addition, we also observe the transition process of the particle experiencing macroviscosity to nanoviscosity of the polymer melts by gradually increasing the chain length. The concentration dependence of the particle diffusion is similar to the results from Heyes et al., and at high volume fractions, the negative deviations from the SE formula are found. By exploring the effect of particle−polymer interaction on the diffusion of the particle larger than the gyration radius of the polymer chain, it is found that the condition where the SE formula becomes valid in the prediction of the particle diffusion is that where different reasonably defined effective hydrodynamic radii must be used.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp800474t

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Metadata

Authors
Liu, J., Cao, D., & Zhang, L.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2008-04-05
Volume
112
Issue
17
Pages
6653-6661
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W2017182404
Cited by
230
References
4
FWCI
7.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Dynamics Study on Nanoparticle Diffusion in Polymer Melts: A Test of the Stokes−Einstein Law. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp800474t
The paper
Liu, J., Cao, D., & Zhang, L. (2008). Molecular Dynamics Study on Nanoparticle Diffusion in Polymer Melts: A Test of the Stokes−Einstein Law. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp800474t

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.