Cited by 117Membrane Separation and Gas TransportZeolite Catalysis and SynthesisMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gas Permeation and Diffusion Characteristics of MFI-Type Zeolite Membranes at High Temperatures

Kanezashi, M., Lin, Y. S.·2009·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

MFI-type zeolite membranes were prepared by the template-free secondary growth method followed by onstream counter-diffusion or one-side chemical vapor deposition (CVD) modification to eliminate intercrystalline pores. Gas permeation and separation experiments were conducted on unmodified and modified membranes at 25−500 °C. For unmodified MFI-type zeolite membranes, single-gas permeation of H 2, He, CO, and CO 2 exhibits characteristics of Knudsen diffusion up to 500 °C, and adsorption of CO 2 on MFI-type zeolite has a strong effect on ternary gas separation (H 2, CO, and CO 2 ) below 300 °C. Counter-diffusion CVD modification is effective in sealing the intercrystalline gaps resulting in defect-free MFI-type zeolite membranes. Permeation of nonadsorbing gases (He, H 2, and CO) through counter-diffusion CVD-modified zeolite membranes also exhibits Knudsen diffusion characteristics with very small activation energies for diffusion (0.1−3 kJ mol −1 ), with gas permeance (diffusivity) decreasing with increasing molecular weight. For one-side CVD-modified MFI-type zeolite membranes, gas permeance (diffusivity) decreases and activation energy for diffusion increases with increasing molecular size because of the formation of an amorphous microporous silica layer. High-temperature gas permeation data on defect-free MFI-type zeolite membranes confirm the translational gas diffusion model for zeolites.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp804586q

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kanezashi, M., & Lin, Y. S.
Affiliations
Hiroshima University (JP)
Corresponding author
Lin, Y. S.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2009-02-05
Volume
113
Issue
9
Pages
3767-3774
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W2013474579
Cited by
115
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
19.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Keywords
gas permeation, gas separation, Knudsen diffusion, CO2 adsorption, hydrogen separation, CO2 separation, amorphous silica layer, diffusion activation energy, molecular weight dependence, zeolite membranes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review