The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Density Functional Theory + U Study of Oxygen Vacancy Formation at the (110), (100), (101), and (001) Surfaces of Rutile TiO2
Abstract
Oxygen vacancy formation at the (110), (100), (001), and (101) surfaces of rutile TiO 2 has been investigated using density functional theory with an on-site correction for strongly correlated systems (DFT + U ). In agreement with experimental data, the reduced (110) surface shows an occupied defect state 0.7 eV below the bottom of the conduction band. The other reduced surfaces also show defect states in the band gap, with the defect state energies being strongly dependent on the choice of surface, and following the trend expected from crystal field arguments. For all the reduced surfaces, the excess charge associated with the defect states is primarily localized on two Ti sites neighboring the vacancy, formally reducing these to Ti III . For the (101) and (001) surfaces these Ti sites are geometrically inequivalent, and the corresponding gap states are separated in energy. Vacancy formation energies vary as Δ E vac (100) > Δ E vac (110) > Δ E vac (001) > Δ E vac (101). The variation in vacancy formation energy and gap state energies suggests potential differences between the surfaces in catalytic behavior for adsorbed reactant molecules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Photocatalysis on TiO2 Surfaces: Principles, Mechanisms, and Selected Results
Linsebigler, A. L., Lu, G., & Yates, J. T. (1995) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00035a013 · Cited by 11,575
The surface science of titanium dioxide
Diebold, U. (2003) · Surface Science Reports · doi:10.1016/s0167-5729(02)00100-0 · Cited by 7,944
Tian, N., Zhou, Z.-Y., Sun, S.-G., Ding, Y., & Wang, Z. L. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1140484 · Cited by 3,073
Surface Science Studies of the Photoactivation of TiO 2 New Photochemical Processes
Thompson, T. L., & Yates, J. T. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050172k · Cited by 2,064
Henrich, V. E., & Kurtz, R. L. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.6280 · Cited by 302
Cited by
Electron-pinned defect-dipoles for high-performance colossal permittivity materials
Hu, W., Liu, Y., Withers, R. L., Frankcombe, T. J., Norén, L., Snashall, A., Kitchin, M., Smith, P., Gong, B., Chen, H., et al. (2013) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3691 · Cited by 1,117
Occupation matrix control of d- and f-electron localisations using DFT + U
Allen, J. P., & Watson, G. W. (2014) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c4cp01083c · Cited by 270
Self-citationDistribution of Ti3+ Surface Sites in Reduced TiO2
Deskins, N. A., Rousseau, R., & Dupuis, M. (2011) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp2001139 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Morgan, B. J., & Watson, G. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-04-01
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 7322-7328
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W1975628207
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Density Functional Theory + U Study of Oxygen Vacancy Formation at the (110), (100), (101), and (001) Surfaces of Rutile TiO2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp811288n
- The paper
- Morgan, B. J., & Watson, G. W. (2009). A Density Functional Theory + U Study of Oxygen Vacancy Formation at the (110), (100), (101), and (001) Surfaces of Rutile TiO2. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp811288n
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
