Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 538

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Atomistic Modeling of Short Pulse Laser Ablation of Metals: Connections between Melting, Spallation, and Phase Explosion

Zhigilei, Leonid V., Lin, Zhibin, Ivanov, Dmitriy S.·2009·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
DOI 10.1021/jp902294m
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The mechanisms of short pulse laser interactions with a metal target are investigated in simulations performed with a model combining the molecular dynamics method with a continuum description of laser excitation, electron−phonon equilibration, and electron heat conduction. Three regimes of material response to laser irradiation are identified in simulations performed with a 1 ps laser pulse, which corresponds to the condition of stress confinement: melting and resolidification of a surface region of the target, photomechanical spallation of a single or multiple layers or droplets, and an explosive disintegration of an overheated surface layer (phase explosion). The processes of laser melting, spallation, and phase explosion are taking place on the same time scale and are closely intertwined with each other. The transition to the spallation regime results in a reduction of the melting zone and a sharp drop in the duration of the melting and resolidification cycle. The transition from spallation to phase explosion is signified by an abrupt change in the composition of the ejected plume (from liquid layers and/or large droplets to a mixture of vapor-phase atoms, small clusters and droplets), and results in a substantial increase in the duration of the melting process. In simulations performed with longer, 50 ps, laser pulses, when the condition for stress confinement is not satisfied, the spallation regime is absent and phase explosion results in smaller values of the ablation yield and larger fractions of the vapor phase in the ejected plume as compared to the results obtained with a 1 ps pulse. The more vigorous material ejection and higher ablation yields, observed in the simulations performed with the shorter laser pulse, are explained by the synergistic contribution of the laser-induced stresses and the explosive release of vapor in phase explosion occurring under the condition of stress confinement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp902294m

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 93

  1. Bäuerle D., 2000, Laser Processing and Chemistry, 10.1007/978-3-662-04074-4 · DOI · Paper page
  2. von Allmen M., 1998, Laser Beam Interactions with Materials
  3. Chrisey D. B., 1994, Pulsed Laser Deposition of Thin Films
  4. Phipps C. R., 2003, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 77, 193, 10.1007/s00339-003-2144-2 · doi:10.1007/s00339-003-2144-2
  5. Anisimov S. I., 1968, Sov. Phys. JETP, 27, 182
  6. Martynyuk M. M., 1976, Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys., 21, 430
  7. Miotello A., 1995, Appl. Phys. Lett., 67, 3535, 10.1063/1.114912 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Miotello A., 1999, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 69, S67, 10.1007/s003390051357 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Bulgakova N. M., 2001, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 73, 199, 10.1007/s003390000686 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Bennett T. D., 1995, J. Appl. Phys., 77, 849, 10.1063/1.359010 · DOI
  11. Brailovsky A. B., 1995, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 61, 81, 10.1007/BF01538216 · doi:10.1007/bf01538216
  12. von Allmen M., 1976, J. Appl. Phys., 47, 5460, 10.1063/1.322578 · doi:10.1063/1.322578
  13. Zweig A. D., 1991, J. Appl. Phys., 70, 1684, 10.1063/1.349537 · doi:10.1063/1.349537
  14. Semak V. V., 2004, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 37, 2925, 10.1088/0022-3727/37/20/022 · doi:10.1088/0022-3727/37/20/022
  15. Paltauf G., 2003, Chem. Rev., 103, 487, 10.1021/cr010436c · DOI · Paper page
  16. Leveugle E., 2004, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 79, 1643, 10.1007/s00339-004-2682-2 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Yang J., 2007, Phys. Rev. B, 76, 165430, 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.165430 · DOI
  18. Masuhara H., 2006, Pure Appl. Chem., 78, 2205, 10.1351/pac200678122205 · doi:10.1351/pac200678122205
  19. Hatanaka K., 2002, J. Phys. Chem. B, 106, 3049, 10.1021/jp014332h · doi:10.1021/jp014332h
  20. Bulgakova N. M., 2005, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 81, 345, 10.1007/s00339-005-3242-0 · DOI
  21. Song K. H., 1998, Appl. Surf. Sci., 127, 111, 10.1016/S0169-4332(97)00619-3 · DOI
  22. Cheng C., 2005, Phys. Rev. B, 72, 165415, 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.165415 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.165415
  23. Porneala C., 2006, Appl. Phys. Lett., 89, 211121, 10.1063/1.2393158 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Yoo J. H., 2000, Appl. Phys. Lett., 76, 783, 10.1063/1.125894 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Povarnitsyn M. E., 2007, Phys. Rev. B, 75, 235414, 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.235414 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Povarnitsyn M. E., 2009, Appl. Surf. Sci., 255, 5120, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.07.199 · DOI
  27. Zhigilei L. V., 1997, Chem. Phys. Lett., 276, 269, 10.1016/S0009-2614(97)00808-7 · DOI
  28. Zhigilei L. V., 2003, Chem. Rev., 103, 321, 10.1021/cr010459r · DOI · Paper page
  29. Zhigilei L. V., 2003, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 76, 339, 10.1007/s00339-002-1818-5 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Leveugle E., 2007, J. Appl. Phys., 102, 074914, 10.1063/1.2783898 · DOI
  31. Vogel A., 2003, Chem. Rev., 103, 577, 10.1021/cr010379n · DOI · Paper page
  32. Kashii M., 2007, Appl. Surf. Sci., 253, 6447, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.01.106 · doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.01.106
  33. Jandeleit J., 1996, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 63, 117, 10.1007/BF01567638 · DOI
  34. Zeng X., 2005, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 80, 237, 10.1007/s00339-004-2963-9 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Tonshoff H. K., 2000, J. Laser. Appl., 12, 23, 10.2351/1.521909 · DOI
  36. Cheng J., 2009, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 95, 739, 10.1007/s00339-008-5037-6 · DOI
  37. Ben-Yakar A., 2007, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 40, 1447, 10.1088/0022-3727/40/5/021 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Nakata Y., 2003, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 42, L1452, 10.1143/JJAP.42.L1452 · doi:10.1143/jjap.42.l1452
  39. Korte F., 2004, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 79, 879, 10.1007/s00339-004-2590-5 · doi:10.1007/s00339-004-2590-5
  40. Kuznetsov A. I., 2009, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 94, 221, 10.1007/s00339-008-4859-6 · DOI
  41. Singha S., 2008, J. Appl. Phys., 104, 113520, 10.1063/1.3040082 · doi:10.1063/1.3040082
  42. Li Y., 2006, Appl. Phys. Lett., 89, 161110, 10.1063/1.2364457 · doi:10.1063/1.2364457
  43. Ivanov D. S., 2008, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 92, 791, 10.1007/s00339-008-4712-y · DOI
  44. Vorobyev A. Y., 2007, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 86, 235, 10.1007/s00339-006-3751-5 · DOI
  45. Lam Y. C., 2007, Laser Part. Beams, 25, 155, 10.1017/S0263034607070206 · DOI
  46. Anisimov S. I., 1974, Sov. Phys. JETP, 39, 375
  47. Ivanov D. S., 2003, Phys. Rev. B, 68, 064114, 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.064114 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Zhigilei, L. V. Garrison, B. J.InMultiscale Modelling of Materials,MRS Symposia Proceedings No. 538, Materials Research Society,Pittsburgh, PA, 1999; pp491−496. · DOI
  49. Schäfer C., 2002, Comput. Mater. Sci., 24, 421, 10.1016/S0927-0256(01)00263-4 · DOI
  50. Zhou X. W., 2001, Acta Mater., 49, 4005, 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00287-7 · doi:10.1016/s1359-6454(01)00287-7
  51. 1972, American Institute of Physics Handbook
  52. Lin Z., 2008, Phys. Rev. B, 77, 075133, 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.075133 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Lin Z., 2007, Appl. Surf. Sci., 253, 6295, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.01.032 · DOI
  54. Ivanov D. S., 2004, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 79, 977, 10.1007/s00339-004-2607-0 · DOI
  55. Ivanov D. S., 2007, Phys. Rev. Lett., 98, 195701, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.195701 · DOI
  56. Ivanov D. S., 2003, Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, 105701, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.105701 · DOI
  57. Lin Z., 2006, Phys. Rev. B, 73, 184113, 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.184113 · DOI
  58. Sokolowski-Tinten K., 1998, Phys. Rev. B, 58, R11805, 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.R11805 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.58.r11805
  59. Chan W.-L., 2008, Phys. Rev. B, 78, 214107, 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.214107 · DOI
  60. Chan W.-L., 2009, Phys. Rev. Lett., 102, 095701, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.095701 · DOI
  61. Fortov V. E., 1991, J. Appl. Phys., 70, 4524, 10.1063/1.349087 · doi:10.1063/1.349087
  62. Tamura H., 2001, J. Appl. Phys., 89, 3520, 10.1063/1.1346996 · doi:10.1063/1.1346996
  63. Zhidkov A. G., 2001, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 73, 741, 10.1007/s003390100887 · doi:10.1007/s003390100887
  64. Zhigilei, L. V.; Ivanov, D. S.; Leveugle, E.; Sadigh, B.; Bringa, E. M.InHigh-Power Laser Ablation V;Phipps, C. R., Ed.Proceedings of SPIE, 2004, Vol. 5448, pp505−519. · DOI
  65. Upadhyay A. K., 2005, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 38, 2933, 10.1088/0022-3727/38/16/029 · DOI
  66. Upadhyay A. K., 2008, Phys. Rev. B, 78, 045437, 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.045437 · DOI
  67. Schäfer C., 2002, Phys. Rev. B, 66, 115404, 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.115404 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Perez D., 2003, Phys. Rev. B, 67, 184102, 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.184102 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Anisimov S. I., 2003, JETP Lett., 77, 606, 10.1134/1.1600815 · DOI
  70. Agranat M. B., 2007, Appl. Surf. Sci., 253, 6276, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.01.077 · DOI
  71. Garrison B. J., 2003, Phys. Rev. E, 68, 041501, 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.041501 · DOI
  72. Young D. A., 1971, Phys. Rev. A, 3, 364, 10.1103/PhysRevA.3.364 · doi:10.1103/physreva.3.364
  73. Nikolaev D. N., 2002, Int. J. Thermophys., 23, 1311, 10.1023/A:1019860808227 · doi:10.1023/a:1019860808227
  74. Fortov V. E., 1997, Pure Appl. Chem., 69, 893, 10.1351/pac199769040893 · doi:10.1351/pac199769040893
  75. Amoruso S., 2007, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 89, 1017, 10.1007/s00339-007-4211-6 · doi:10.1007/s00339-007-4211-6
  76. Noël S., 2007, Appl. Surf. Sci., 253, 6310, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.01.081 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Hermann J., 2008, Laser Phys., 18, 374, 10.1134/S1054660X08040026 · doi:10.1134/s1054660x08040026
  78. Sokolowski-Tinten K., 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, 224, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.224 · DOI · Paper page
  79. Inogamov N. A., 1999, JETP Lett., 69, 310, 10.1134/1.568029 · doi:10.1134/1.568029
  80. Le Harzic R., 2002, Appl. Phys. Lett., 80, 3886, 10.1063/1.1481195 · DOI · Paper page
  81. Feng Q., 2005, Scripta Mater., 53, 511, 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.05.006 · DOI
  82. Nolte S., 1997, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 14, 2716, 10.1364/JOSAB.14.002716 · DOI · Paper page
  83. Semak V. V., 2006, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 39, 3440, 10.1088/0022-3727/39/15/031 · doi:10.1088/0022-3727/39/15/031
  84. Furusawa K., 1999, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 69, S359, 10.1007/s003390051417 · DOI · Paper page
  85. Mannion P. T., 2004, Appl. Surf. Sci., 233, 275, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.03.229 · DOI · Paper page
  86. Mannion P. T., 2007, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 59, 753
  87. Liu B., 2007, Appl. Phys. Lett., 90, 044103, 10.1063/1.2434168 · DOI
  88. Zhang L., 2008, Appl. Surf. Sci., 255, 3097, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.08.098 · DOI
  89. Ancona A., 2009, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 94, 19, 10.1007/s00339-008-4906-3 · DOI
  90. Cheng C., 2007, Int. J. Thermophys., 28, 9, 10.1007/s10765-006-0137-z · doi:10.1007/s10765-006-0137-z
  91. Lorazo P., 2003, Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, 225502, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.225502 · DOI · Paper page
  92. Perez D., 2006, Appl. Phys. Lett., 89, 141907, 10.1063/1.2358941 · DOI
  93. Xu X., 1999, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 69, S869, 10.1007/s003390051549 · doi:10.1007/s003390051549

Cited by

See all 538

Metadata

Authors
Zhigilei, L. V., Lin, Z., & Ivanov, D. S.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2009-06-08
Volume
113
Issue
27
Pages
11892-11906
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
DOI
10.1021/jp902294m
OpenAlex
W1988330065
Cited by
538
References
3
FWCI
17.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.