The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electron-phonon coupling and electron heat capacity of metals under conditions of strong electron-phonon nonequilibrium
Abstract
The dependence of the strength of the electron-phonon coupling and the electron heat capacity on the electron temperature is investigated for eight representative metals, Al, Cu, Ag, Au, Ni, Pt, W, and Ti, for the conditions of strong electron-phonon nonequilibrium. These conditions are characteristic of metal targets subjected to energetic ion bombardment or short-pulse laser irradiation. Computational analysis based on first-principles electronic structure calculations of the electron density of states predicts large deviations (up to an order of magnitude) from the commonly used approximations of linear temperature dependence of the electron heat capacity and a constant electron-phonon coupling. These thermophysical properties are found to be very sensitive to details of the electronic structure of the material. The strength of the electron-phonon coupling can either increase (Al, Au, Ag, Cu, and W), decrease (Ni and Pt), or exhibit nonmonotonic changes (Ti) with increasing electron temperature. The electron heat capacity can exhibit either positive (Au, Ag, Cu, and W) or negative (Ni and Pt) deviations from the linear temperature dependence. The large variations of the thermophysical properties, revealed in this work for the range of electron temperatures typically realized in femtosecond laser material processing applications, have important implications for quantitative computational analysis of ultrafast processes associated with laser interaction with metals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Kresse, G., & Joubert, D. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 · Cited by 85,307
Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations
Monkhorst, H. J., & Pack, J. D. (1976) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.13.5188 · Cited by 71,721
Cited by
Wu, C., & Zhigilei, L. V. (2014) · Applied Physics A · doi:10.1007/s00339-013-8086-4 · Cited by 367
Self-citationKanitz, A., Kalus, M.-R., Gurevich, E. L., Ostendorf, A., Barcikowski, S., & Amans, D. (2019) · Plasma Sources Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/1361-6595/ab3dbe · Cited by 195
Shih, C.-Y., Shugaev, M. V., Wu, C., & Zhigilei, L. V. (2020) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d0cp00608d · Cited by 136
Self-citationVallabhaneni, A. K., Singh, D., Bao, H., Murthy, J., & Ruan, X. (2016) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.125432 · Cited by 134
Byskov-Nielsen, J., Savolainen, J.-M., Christensen, M. S., & Balling, P. (2011) · Applied Physics A · doi:10.1007/s00339-011-6363-7 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, Z., Zhigilei, L. V., & Celli, V.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-02-28
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W2060831210
- Cited by
- 1,444
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 107.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electron-phonon coupling and electron heat capacity of metals under conditions of strong electron-phonon nonequilibrium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.77.075133
- The paper
- Lin, Z., Zhigilei, L. V., & Celli, V. (2008). Electron-phonon coupling and electron heat capacity of metals under conditions of strong electron-phonon nonequilibrium. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.77.075133
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.